A Boring Dystopia

9777 readers

170 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

givesomefucks@lemmy.world

1542

Chat is this real (lemmy.dbzer0.com)

submitted 3 months ago by SnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/aboringdystopia@lemmy.world

194 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] radiohead37@lemmynsfw.com 91 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Arbitration is never the right answer. Fix the judicial system, don’t privatize it.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think we should be allowed to opt in to arbitration from within the public judicial system, once charges have already been brought forward. Then people will only agree to it when it's legit just saving time/money, and won't change the likely ruling.

A public system designed for everyone can never be as cheap as one specific to the issue/people at hand. It just needs to always be available as a fallback.

[–] radiohead37@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think what you are mentioning is basically how settlements work.

I just can’t see how an arbitration company that is selected by a company will ever have the incentives to side with consumers.

I can only see arbitration working when both sides have equal leverage. Large company vs large company, citizen vs citizen. And both sides must have a say on which arbitration company is selected.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

What I'm mentioning will frequently lead to settlements, but the choice of whether or not to use arbitration is typically made before there's any case.

Both sides don't have equal leverage today because of an information asymmetry market failure. The cost to the consumer to read the ToS (and research its arbitrators) for everything they buy is unreasonably high, while it costs the company very little. If consumers only had to research arbitrators after the fact, then the company would have a strong incentive to agree to a fair one, avoiding the public courts.