this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
202 points (96.8% liked)

News

23361 readers
3497 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Maybe they should also start building more apartments at rent controlled rates?

Its not just about the empty spots. Those are owned.

Its about the rich people denying apartments to maintain the clean skyline.

Edit: added also

[–] FrowingFostek@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Nah, I'm with Num10ck. There are more than enough houses with existing infrastructure to utilities. Putting up more homes is wasteful and adds carbon into the air.

The state has the power to levy a heavy vacancy tax on unoccupied spaces. I think thats the best route to getting people housed.

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Oh I also agree we need to tax unoccupied housing. On a sliding scale too since there are land barons rampant in our nation.

This would force real estate companies to fill homes that costs them loads to keep empty. Instantly increasing supply and thus cost of rent goes down.

[–] FrowingFostek@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Oh OK I must have misunderstood you. I'm all about rent stabilizing and taxing the rich.

Carry on.

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

I wasn't clear. Edited an also for clarification.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

Rent control disincentivizes building new apartments though. That is, if I take out a load of debt to build a $10M apartment, and due to rent control my profit is going to be capped at levels that are probably below what I could get through low-risk treasury bills, why would I build anything? Sure, you can get it built by the state, but states have a distressing tendency to stop adequately funding required infrastructure and not do necessary maintenance in a timely fashion (more so than most shitty apartment complexes even).

I entirely agree that NIMBYs need to be steamrolled though. High-density housing is far, far better than sprawl.