Anarchism

3703 readers

1 users here now

Are you an Anarchist? The answer might surprise you!

Rules:

Be respectful
Don't be a nazi
Argue about the point and not the person
This is not the place to debate the merits of anarchism itself. While discussion is encouraged, getting in your “epic dunks on the anarkiddies” is not. As a result of the instance’s poor moderation policies and hostility toward anarchists by default, lemmygrad users are encouraged not to post here, though not explicitly disallowed if they aren’t just looking to start a fight.

See also:

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

poVoq

Least authoritarian stateist (lemmy.world)

submitted 3 months ago by bi_tux@lemmy.world to c/anarchism@lemmy.ml

27 comments fedilink hide all child comments

also he thought that the CCP wasn't even suppressing free speech, guess who just got banned from a certain tankie cercle jerk instance

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee -1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The second one is just more plausible to me, just looks like special pleading to claim otherwise.

"Just more plausible to me" is another way of saying, "I'm biased", especially when you're intentionally ignoring reporting by people that have a degree of expertise in the issue, and are showing their work.

a refugee political dissadent “felt unsafe”

If a woman said that she had a stalker showing up everywhere she went, I would hope that you wouldn't say that they just sounded paranoid. It's not normal or acceptable behaviour for a person's former country--whether it's the US, Russia, or China, or any other country--to follow them around and threaten them (assuming that they aren't an immediate security risk).

When the US does shit like this, call them the fuck out! Fuck knows that the US has done some pretty egregiously awful shit, like the Tuskeegee syphilis experiments (!!!). But you're hypocritical if you aren't going to accept the same level of evidence regarding China, Russia, et al., and also call them out.

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

If a woman said that she had a stalker showing up everywhere she went,

Yes, that's a big issue, but it's not what's happening.

She said she doesn't know where they are located because the harassment happened virtually.

Very different to say "I had people threaten me nonspecifically online" vs "the police followed me home"

I completely disavow all state repression. These people seem very intimidated and they should feel safe, but I could list a litany of awful shit the US has done with far more concrete evidence. (I really don't feel it's necessary and it would just get dismissed as whataboutism anyways.)

However I don't agree with extrapolating a testimony of online harassments into some narrative about how these aren't just random civically-minded volunteers but a vast world-spanning conspiracy to surreptitiously kidnap offenders. It's unfounded and the fact that the link you provided is citing elected conservatives demagoguing should really cue you into that.

[–] marcie@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

If a woman said that she had a stalker showing up everywhere she went, I would hope that you wouldn’t say that they just sounded paranoid.

Excuse me, are you a woman? If not, fuck off with these analogies