this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
47 points (98.0% liked)

Australia

3588 readers
190 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Queensland’s Labor government turned heads last week with a bold new election promise. If returned to power, it would set up 12 state-owned petrol stations and limit fuel price rises to just five cents a litre on any given day.

The proposal certainly tapped into a pain point for Queenslanders – Brisbane topped national petrol price rankings last year.

But it was quickly met with a predictable pile on from opposing political commentators, industry bodies and some economists, attracting labels like “risky” and “dumb and stupid”.

Mark McKenzie, chief executive of the Australasian Convenience and Petroleum Marketers Association, called it a “wildly bizarre intervention” in the retail fuel market.

So is the Queensland premier really out of his mind, trying to win votes less than three months out from an election? Or is there actually some merit to this proposal?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] trk@aussie.zone 38 points 2 months ago (6 children)

But more often than not, Australia’s citizens found themselves little better off if at all. This turned out to be a common international experience for other countries privatising their utilities.

Name one thing that's been privatised that has resulted in any combination of better product, better service, or better price?

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Your comment couldn't have been clearer, but 3 out of the 4 replies to it seem to have interpreted it to mean exactly the opposite of what it says.

Either that, or those three comments are incredibly fucking dumb and their idea of "better product" is "more money for corporations".

[–] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

have you seen how much cheaper 1kg on a falcon 9 is compared to the sls

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yes, your comment was the one out of four that wasn’t stupid.

[–] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ah yeah, your instance is defederated from Beehaw, which is where one of the three errors came from. (They said "water/sewer systems".)

[–] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

oh right, I forgot beehaw defederated from world and shit because of mass signups

that was so long ago, do you know how beehaw is doing?

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 2 points 2 months ago

I couldn't tell you how they're doing with much confidence, but their communities all seem pretty good to me.

[–] unionagainstdhmo@aussie.zone 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Commonwealth Bank:

  • Shitty interest rates
  • account fees

Telstra:

  • Patchy coverage
  • Poor uptime after natural disasters

Wait nevermind

[–] dgriffith@aussie.zone 4 points 2 months ago

Telecom wasn't exactly a shining example of a government run service though.

Side note: Bring back the CES , privatised job search is an absolute fucking disaster.

[–] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

anything that benefits from/has potential for innovation really (things like launch vehicles), but public services and fully optimised industries whose only method of "improving efficiency" is enshittification should be owned by the people

[–] memfree@beehaw.org -4 points 2 months ago

Water/sewer systems

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com -4 points 2 months ago

rapid transit. chicagos el system the various lines were all independently owned but now they are part of one system with free transfers between them and even bus and train.