Science Memes

11130 readers

3361 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
Keep it rooted (on topic).
No spam.
Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

!spiders@lemmy.world

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Sal@mander.xyz

fossilesque@mander.xyz

SciBot@mander.xyz

1566

Technically Correct (mander.xyz)

submitted 3 months ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz

188 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 180 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Big caveat

The final decision rests with the TSA officer on whether an item is allowed through the checkpoint.

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 134 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Ah yes, the "rules only apply when I say they do" rule. Much legitimate.

[–] bss03@infosec.pub 9 points 3 months ago

Inconsistent enforcement of "the rules" is the most common form of systematic marginalization.

It's also easy of centrists to excuse, since it could happen to anyone, even when the statistic show to it is overwhelmingly correlated with some protected trait.

[+] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de -13 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I mean sure, but it theoretically stops people arguing and threatening to try and bring stuff they shouldn't really be bringing through, as being able to point at that will end a lot of arguments... Equally though, it makes a lot of sense as otherwise you'd have "ah yes this bomb isn't banned because I've switched out a molecule in the explosive for an analogue"

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 26 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I don't think they need to make the enforcement of rules ultimately arbitrary to prevent explosives. You already can't bring explosives. The molecules involved are not relevant.

[–] Ziglin@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

The mollecular structure isn't the only thing relevant for bombs.

You could make a bomb out of a pressurized material that you can quickly get to expand, I think that technically isn't an explosive.

I get your point but I also think having a catch all is good to prevent things that could otherwise get through by technicality.

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 10 points 3 months ago

If there is a list of acceptable things, then those specific things are not things they "shouldn't be bringing on".

[–] redisdead@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

What actually happens is that some random power tripping TSA agent decides to annoy the fuck out of people he doesn't like, and when challenged he is protected by this rule.

[–] bradinutah@thelemmy.club 23 points 3 months ago

See, flying isn't for people who plan. It's for people who roll 20s and not 1s. You know, lucky people. That's the message here.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 6 points 3 months ago

And it's not the type of crowd that will take a 'technically correct' in good sport.