this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2024
758 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19090 readers
4155 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CableMonster@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The issue is that the corporate media lies to you and shapes our government with lies. They do it over and over and over and for some reason you keep believing them.

I am not in a cult because I am not part of your team or the other team or any team for that matter. When someone claims "trump advocating injecting disinfectant", I would "le me see the video" and then I would see they lied.

[–] undergroundoverground@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't disagree that they lie. I disagree that they can make trump out to be worse than he is.

No, sorry, you're here being as culty as anyone else.

[–] CableMonster@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

How is he so bad? Be very direct and specific.

[–] undergroundoverground@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Wow, for someone not on either side, you sure went to that one real fast.

Let me get this straight, you think I have to justify what I think of someone to your satisfaction before deciding if my reasons for me choosing them are good enough for me?

Is that how you see this going?

[–] CableMonster@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You said that he is they cant make out trump worse than he already is, they make him out to be a racist, fascist, hitler like figure that is going to end elections. So you much have some really solid things about him that make him "out to be worse than he is."

[–] undergroundoverground@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'll take that as a "yes, I did expect you to justify your feelings to my personal satisfaction."

He is racist. In fact, his first election campaign was just racism and a magical wall that paid for itself. He acts exactly like a modern "strongman" facsist leader and his policies and attempts to overthrow and circumvent American democracy, such as it is, speaks for themselves. I don't think he's as bad as hitler. At least we can agree on that. Although, I haven't seen any news reports try to make him out to be as bad as hitler.

[–] CableMonster@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Lets just take the first claim - "He is racist". You said that with a definitive statement so there has to be definitive proof. Please show me the proof in context please. Thank you!

[–] undergroundoverground@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I love how you keep doubling down on the presumptive arrogance.

As strange as it may sound to you, I actually don't need to prove what I know myself to have seen, to your personal satisfaction, in order to maintain that belief. Its just bizzare that you think that plus the inevitable burden of proof fallacy you plan on using is going to work here. I mean, you've worked your way through a good list of invalid arguments, in an attempt to make me refute the evidence of my eyes and ears. I don't know what to say to you really.

This is the internet, not a criminal court of law where I'm the state and you're the defendant. If anything, its on you to disprove the commonly accepted consensus. As if you think you can assign homework to people you disagree with.

You made the claim that the media is wrong about trump being a racist. I said but he is.

You own logic puts the burden on you. Let me guess, you don't like your own rules anymore?

[–] CableMonster@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Gotcha, you want me to prove a negative... That actually not possible to do... So long story short you cant prove the assertion you made?

[–] undergroundoverground@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Again, nice try but 'you cannot prove a negative" is itself a negative claim that would not be true if it could be proven true.

I'll add that one to your long list of invalid arguments shall I?

I'll take that as a "no, I've suddenly decided I no longer like the rules I failed to impose on you." I've only ever seen cult members use as many fallacious arguments as you do. You didn't even attempt to argue that trump wasn't a racists despite claiming it to be thus and such, without a shred of evidence. Youre happy to believe it despite your own false claim that you can prove a negative.

Sorry but youre going to have to do a lot better than invalid arguments and sealioning. I can't even blame you for it, as it must work on people.

[–] CableMonster@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So then you cant prove trump is racist?

[–] undergroundoverground@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Not to someone who's determined to deny it, no matter the cost, and engage in any manner of fallacious, underhanded, side stepping nonsense they believe will further their cause.

Unfortunately, it would take some intellectual integrity from you and you've shown yourself to be utterly devoid of any, over and over again.

I mean, you can't even prove the assertion you originally made. Instead you claim I have to prove you wrong, burden of proof fallacy, even after your argument of "you can't prove a negative" falls to pieces.

So, you can't prove trump isn't a racist, despite claiming the media is lying about him being racist? In fact, even worse, you won't even attempt to demonstrate the claim you made to be true.

[–] CableMonster@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Gotcha you are just going to filibuster. Have a great day!

Gotcha, you're only used to arguing with people dumb enough to fall for your cheap tricks and poor, invalid arguments. If that's all I had, I'd run away too.

You also!