Technology

59414 readers

3459 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

873

Does everyone hate Google now? | Google's story over the last two decades has been a tale as old as time: enshittification for growth (arstechnica.com)

submitted 3 months ago by ForgottenFlux@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

126 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Google's story over the last two decades has been a tale as old as time: enshittification for growth. The once-beloved startup—with its unofficial "Don't Be Evil" motto—has instead become a major Internet monopolist, as a federal judge ruled on Monday, dominating the market for online search. Google is also well-known for its data-harvesting practices, for constantly killing off products, and for facilitating the rise of brain-cell-destroying YouTubers who make me Fear for Today's Youth. (Maybe that last one is just me?)

Google's rapid rise from "scrappy search engine with doodles" to "dystopic mega-corporation" has been remarkable in many ways, especially when you consider just how much goodwill the company squandered so quickly. Along the way, though, Google has achieved one unexpected result: In a divided America, it offers just about everyone something to hate.

Here are just a few of the players hating Google today.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Modva@lemmy.world 87 points 3 months ago (3 children)

We demand infinite growth. Why? Because shareholders want to buy shares and sell them later for more.

Do anything it takes to make that transaction happen, cut people's jobs en masse, whatever.

Forever.

[–] profdc9@lemmy.world 31 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Stock holders demand infinite growth. If the management doesn't make money, they put in place new management. A company is only worth the value of the next stock buyback or dividend. It's baked into the structure of corporations, especially publicly-owned corporations.

[–] PhAzE@lemmy.ca 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Stock holders can sue the company if there's a loss, too. That shouldn't be a thing, but here we are.

[–] JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee 12 points 3 months ago

Whoever passed that bullshit is responsible for so much of what's wrong with our economy.

[–] AutomaticUpdates@monero.town 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

*Capitalism demands infinite growth. Because the goal of Capitalism first and foremost isn't providing a good product or upholding moral values, but making money.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Infinite growth in a closed and limited system.

I see absolutely nothing wrong with this.

edit

/s for the oblivious

[–] Potatisen@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

WE don't demand it.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

By context "we" refers to google.

[–] Potatisen@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Derp, of course. Re-reading it now, so obvious.