Asklemmy

43893 readers

1000 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Would you wear a body cam at work? (lemm.ee)

submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by perishthethought@lemm.ee to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

66 comments fedilink hide all child comments

If body cams get cheaper and cheaper, companies might start asking more people to wear them while working.

E.g.: https://coloradosun.com/2024/07/31/youth-corrections-audio-surveillance/

I could see this for ~~doctors~~, at restaurants, ~~stores,~~, etc... eventually.

Are you ready to wear one?

EDIT TO ADD: A few people said this wouldn't ever make sense for doctors (privacy laws) or for fixed locations (stores). I should have thought of that.

But what about Uber / bus drivers, or repair people who go into homes? I can imagine a large corporation thinking a cam is a good idea, for their own CYA (not for the customers' or the employees').

Also I don't like this idea either, to be clear. I was mostly playing devil's advocate here to see what you all think. Thanks for sharing your thoughts. Pretty much what I expected, tbh

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Draw the line at jobs where someone wields authority over the public, disputes can't be easily resolved after the fact, and the person doing the job moves around too much for fixed cameras to be adequate. I can't off the top of my head think of an example that isn't in law enforcement.

If you take away the authority part, you could say that, for example, cleaning personnel should wear body cameras because it's so easy for them to commit theft, but they're already treated pretty poorly and I wouldn't want them humiliated further.

[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

I heartily agree: they should be a tool to serve the public interest. That police can withhold that footage after an incident or have any justification having a camera off in public, I find it reprehensible.

Using it on private citizens feels more like having a cheap overseer...just a tool to punish.