this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2024
524 points (98.3% liked)

politics

19072 readers
3858 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Alternative headline: Trump finally tells the truth about something.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 99 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

Trump was talking about this country dumping all their criminals in the USA. He said:

"He liked to say he did something with a social experiment. A criminal is a criminal as they generally say a criminal and we don’t have time to figure it out, but we’re not going to take criminals and we’re going to get rid of the criminals that we've been given by all these countries from all over the world."

Now if you want to give him the benefit of the doubt and interpret that "criminal is a criminal" line as something he is quoting from someone else, you go right ahead. I do not give him the benefit of the doubt though. Even if he is quoting someone else, he is not disputing the point. He appears to be accepting it as fact and his response is that he's going to get rid of those criminals.

/Apologies for deleting and then un-deleting, I hit enter too soon while transcribing and wanted to avoid confusion.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

Trump / Vance 2024: A criminal is a criminal as they generally say a criminal

It's kind of Gilbert and Sullivan-esque. G&S would have a field day with trump.

[–] Zeke@fedia.io 11 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Shouldn't he be getting rid of himself then?

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

One would think so, but he's clearly not that self aware.

[–] thejoker954@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

He's not a criminal in his mind. Because he's a nutter.

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah that's fair, I'm not giving him the benefit of the doubt so much as just how I heard it(based on his voice, he wasn't talking normally- instead he sounded like he was quoting), but there's definitely two possible ways to interpret it.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Even if he is quoting someone… he’s quoting them for the justification of getting rid of them.

He clearly agrees with the statement.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Exactly what benefit is being given to him by allowing his complete lack of self awareness?