this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2024
12 points (100.0% liked)

Liberty Hub

273 readers
18 users here now

  1. No Discrimination, this includes usage of slurs or other language intended to promote bigotry
  2. No defending oppressive systems or organizations
  3. No uncivil or rude comments to other users
  4. Discussion, not debate. This community is exclusively for genuine logical debate, any comments using whataboutism or similar will be removed.
  5. No genocide denial or support for genocidal entities. Anyone that supports the mass murder of civilians will be banned.

These guidelines are meant to allow open discussion and ensure leftists and post-leftists can have a voice. If you are here to learn, then welcome! Just remember that if you're not a part of the left (Liberals don't count) then you are a visitor, please do not speak over our members.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 

kittenzrulz claims that the takeover of this community was entirely over links getting burned out. this post would appear to contradict that.

furthermore, they completely disregarded my points in the questions i asked, particularly around the ideological motive around the changes they made when giving feedback, and failed to respond when i pushed them on the point, despite posting elsewhere.

i would argue that both the mod of this community, and the admin of the instance, are hostile to anarchist and leftist politics, and cannot be trusted. recommend finding a new instance.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (5 children)

The post you linked to by MindTraveller is an active misrepresentation of events.

Traveller and I are not "in agreement" about much of anything. Their politics are very far removed from mine

This is the text of the message I sent advising that I was shutting the group down.

After consideration, I’ve decided that non voters does not really fit the stated goals of blahaj zone. Your motives for creating it seem based on a personal vendetta, and whilst your views are genuine, nothing constructive comes from the community. All it does is create division, because its sole purpose is to target others, without really focusing on any progressive ideas or discussion of its own.

At the moment, it’s causing more harm than good to the overall community.

I’ll leave the community open, so that if you choose to set the community up on another instance, you will have the opportunity to direct them to the new location.

Given the post which you linked, (which I had not seen until now) I will be removing Traveller and the new community, because once more, the goal appears to be to create division

My goal of blahaj zone is not political. The goal is to allow trans people to have a space where they can exist on their own terms, without having to pretend to be someone they're not. My own political views are closer to Links/LibertyHub than nonvoters or its ilk. Yet as long as there is no bigotry or gatekeeping, then trans people with politics at odds with my own are welcome. It's why we have an "armed queers" community, despite my own strong distaste for gun culture.

Communities/posters that exist primary to create division, without adding anything positive back, have no place here.

[–] belligerentkitten@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

well thank you for clarifying and doing this much, i guess. but frankly this hasn’t been a safe place, none of this situation has been okay and i’m extremely not comfortable with grail’s behaviour as well. i’ve moved to hexbear despite my political differences with them and they’re honestly creating a far safer and more welcoming space for me as an anarchist and trans person. like seriously sort this place out if you want it to be safe for trans people. it currently is not.

[–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

like seriously sort this place out if you want it to be safe for trans people. it currently is not.

Hexbear is only safe for trans folks whose politics don't clash too strongly with theirs. They have a whole community dedicated to dunking on folk who disagree with them, and that includes trans folk. If you step too far from what they deem acceptable, harassing and dogpiling is seen as an acceptable response.

Many of the trans folks on blahaj zone, despite being left aligned, would be deemed to be "libs" by Hexbear, and actively harassed until they left.

If you think that it's ok that the majority of folk on this instance (well, the majority of trans folk anywhere to be honest) are valid targets for harassment, I don't know what to tell you other than we have very different ideas of what trans safety looks like.

[–] Ambii@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

I've seen you repeat this three times now and I don't understand why you feel the need to exaggerate so heavily.

You can look the posts up, they're in the first ten pages of the top year posts (i.e. since hexbear started federation with other instances). Or don't, and you can continue scaring people away from from a place that aggressively moderates to keep its trans users away from bad actors at the first sign of trouble.

[–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

To the best of my knowledge, the dunk tank is still there, which is a community centered around harassment of "libs". Unless the admins have stepped in to remove that community, then my comment still stands.

[–] Ambii@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Your original comment does not stand but okay.

I just hope next time a DRONERIGHTS or midtraveler comes along you'll act quicker

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 3 months ago

Can hope but it's doubtful at this point

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Those statements are misleading. hexbears routinely break and bend their own dunk tank rules when they feel salty enough.

[–] Ambii@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

You can look it up bud i don't really give a shit what the guy who popularized the term 'brigading' thinks.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't have to look it up. I've experienced it multiple times. Also, you think I popularized "brigading"?!

[–] Ambii@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago
[–] Ranger@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 3 months ago

Thank you for allowing armedqweers to exist here Ada.

[–] TwiddleTwaddle@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 3 months ago

You're the best Ada thanks for everything!

[–] Mechoselachia@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

When I hear "My goal of blahaj zone is not political," I hear "I want my group to have no immune system so that fascism can insidiously sneak in past our noses."

[–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If I said "politics has no place on blahaj zone" that would be a fair accusation.

But politics explicitly has a place on blahaj zone, precisely because of the impact it has on the lives our community. It needs to be talked about. Politics has a place here, because it has to have a place here. But it's not the primary reason the space exists.

[–] Mechoselachia@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Your goal for the entire site is non-political. Being a safe space for trans people is a political goal, intrinsically, in my opinion. Do you have a wildly different definition of "political" than the one I'm using?

[–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Your goal for the entire site is non-political.

We are a left leaning instance that is explicitly welcoming of political discussion, and home to several communities focused on politics.

You are mistakenly conflating the fact that we don't center politics with the idea that we're trying to avoid it.

[–] Mechoselachia@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I know your secret, Ada; you want to protect trans people, and you use any power in your hands to save trans lives if and when you can. Being queer is a radical political act, and one which you and your community don't just avoid, but are in full support of. It's okay to acknowledge it. It's a good thing, in fact.

[–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 3 months ago

Why would I avoid it? I'm openly, loudly and proudly queer. In the daily I'm covered in pride symbol's, and i have an estrogen tattoo.

I'm an advocate and an activist, and this space is part of it.

I'm political, but this space is a result of my politics, not a vehicle for it, because my advocacy includes people who don't share my political views.

[–] Grail@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Mindtraveller was nothing but supportive of Me the other day when I was being misgendered and grilled on My pronouns by other users. The only other people who were acting like trans allies were yourself and the two mods of this community. And I'm very grateful to you for removing the comments and kittenzrulz for allowing Me to return to this community. But Mindtraveller did something different, which was being deeply vocal about trans inclusivity, and I needed to hear that. It helped Me deal with the anxiety I get when I'm exposed to that sort of thing. Who's going to yell at transphobes and run c/soulism if they're gone?

Also it looks from this thread like the mods of this community are allowing Mindtraveller to be a member, since they have a comment in this thread. They say they're cooperating with the mods of Liberty Hub and there's not going to be any more infighting. Where's the division?

[–] Ambii@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Also it looks from this thread like the mods of this community are allowing Mindtraveller to be a member, since they have a comment in this thread. They say they’re cooperating with the mods of Liberty Hub and there’s not going to be any more infighting. Where’s the division?

The mod(singular since the soulists chased the others out) is probably inactive and may also have been chased out because of the aftermath.

The division is how midtraveler is constantly starting arguments with people who don't share their views. If hexbear gets defederated for this behavior, why did midtraveler get an admin endorsement when it only caused more division?

[–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The division is how midtraveler is constantly starting arguments with people who don't share their views. If hexbear gets defederated for this behavior

Hexbear was defederated because they allow dunking and targetting of folk they don't agree with. They were defederated because of their dogpiling.

MindTraveller's community was allowed to exist on the explicit provision that it didn't do that.

And then it was removed when it became clear it was doing nothing but damaging the community.

[–] Grail@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Can you explain what was the content of the removed post where Mindtraveller lied about you? What was Mindtraveller saying that wasn't true?

[–] Grail@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Telling people to use a trans person's preferred pronouns isn't starting an argument. The arguments were started when those people misgendered Me. There's nothing wrong with responding negatively to transphobia. I'm very grateful that they did. It really helped with My mental health.

[–] Ranger@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Mindtraviler continually tried to rules lawyer in the communities I mod for when they where never active in those communities.

[–] Grail@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] Ranger@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It was mostly through the report function & I've been unable to upload images. I made a post in meta talking about the image issue.

[–] Grail@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I had a problem with images too the other day. I couldn't embed any links to imgur. So what are they reporting and why?

[–] Ranger@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They where reporting criticism of government officials & comments about protests as electioneering.

[–] Grail@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Those can definitely be electioneering, depending on the context. The first one almost certainly, the second one is more finicky. Sounds like they were helping you out.

[–] TwiddleTwaddle@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

There are others that respect Your pronouns without also behaving as confrontationally as MindTraveller. There's plenty to criticize about them without misgendering anyone.

[–] Grail@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Well, I like that Mindtraveller was mean to the people who misgendered Me. It made Me feel respected. I'm very grateful to Ada and Kittenzrulz, but they weren't mean to transphobes like Mindtraveller was. Is that what all this is about, them being mean in that thread? I liked it. Do other people think it was bad?

[–] Ambii@lemmy.ml 13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Well, I like that Mindtraveller was mean to the people who misgendered Me.

And again when the mean tankies do it it's "dogpiling."

Midtraveler wasn't just mean, they were belligerent at any perceived slight towards their beliefs. They created a comm dedicated to specifically "satirize" this comm as a reaction to having their transphobia allegations denied (and their first attempt to shut this comm down) after they took offense at the mod's stances.

I don't understand why Ada didn't immediately see that it was clearly directly targeting members of this community and it's one of the reasons I decided to stop using this instance.

[–] Grail@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Well, I can't see Non Voters because it's banned, but what I can see is that the modlog of Liberty Hub says they were unbanned from here 3 days ago. So if that community was created to attack this one, then it's clearly been forgiven by Liberty Hub. And c/soulism didn't have any personal attacks when I visited it. So where's the division? Who exactly is still fighting this fight other than you and Ada? If Mindtraveller quit fighting Liberty Hub and Liberty Hub quit fighting Mindtraveller, what's the problem? Why aren't we all friends? I like Ada, I like kittenzrulz, I like Mindtraveller. It seems like kittenzrulz likes Mindtraveller and I haven't seen any evidence that Mindtraveller doesn't like kittenzrulz. They're saying in this thread that they're working together. So it seems like all of us are getting along. Who's still fighting? Ada, apparently, and I don't know why.

I didn't like this community either when LOC misgendered Me. But LOC apologised, I forgave them, and this community even had a change in leadership and resolved not to ban people so often. Now I like this community. Mindtraveller and kittenzrulz are getting along now too. There was a problem, it got fixed, now everyone's friends. Right?

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I wish things were that simple, right now this community is tearing itself from within. Nothing I do, nor how much I apologize appears to appease many of these people.

[–] Grail@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

A lot of the regulars here want you to keep on banning and insulting anyone they disagree with. They want fights and they want a divided community. That's what they've always wanted. And LOC banned anyone who didn't want that, so now most of your regulars are the people who do. You've got a community made out of people who want trouble. If you don't cause trouble for them by banning all dissenters, then they'll make the trouble for you.

I think you should go back and do a mass unban of people who were banned for silly reasons. You should try to build community of people who want open and respectful discussion with other leftists, and hope over time those voices drown out the ones spoiling for a fight. I don't think you're going to be able to calm down a lot of these people except through the passage of time. They're probably really distrustful because LOC was so distrustful. They'll only believe you can do well as a moderator if they see it with their own eyes. They won't believe anything you say if it's just words.

Also, I'm curious. How did you leave things off with Mindtraveller? Were they causing any problems after the change in leadership? Was there any division between them and you?

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Im not sure if I can, im dealing with enough issues already.

[–] Ambii@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

Don't do that tbh, the people that were banned were mostly banned for being aggressive towards the viewpoints shared here. The community will only get MORE argumentative.

[–] TwiddleTwaddle@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Nice strawman. That's not what I'm referring to at all. I understand that I was vague enough in my previous response to leave room for that though, so fair enough.

I'm living my real actual life right now and don't have time to articulate why they're toxic, because it's friday night for me. I respect you enough to give You this much for now. If I'm still of the same mind tomorrow I'll try to elaborate further, again out of respect for You

[–] Grail@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Thank you. It's just that I've seen nothing but good things from them. And I understand precisely why these good things would make some people upset. What I don't understand is why anyone sensible is mad at them. And I can't see the post Ada says they're lying about either, so I can't check any of this Myself.

[–] TwiddleTwaddle@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 3 months ago

You know what? I have changed my mind after sleeping off my drinks.

Already in this thread You have engaged in strawman arguments and sealioning. I won't engage with that level of bad faith in this community. Under Link's moderation it never would have stayed up here at all.

I miss the old LibertyHub already.