this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2023
718 points (97.5% liked)

Asklemmy

43400 readers
884 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Cloak@lemmy.ml
mekhos@lemmy.ml
tmpod@lemmy.pt
14specks@lemmy.ml
718
Every generation has some product/ingredient that they didn’t know was dangerous at the time: tobacco, lead, asbestos, etc. What is that item for this generation? (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by Jpopy@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
628 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jmp242@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think the SPE is that good a reference, and also not super meaningful to this sort of case of Internet manipulation anyway. Look at the amount of points showing it was basically not a normal experiment but predetermined to act out how the PI wanted - in that wikipedia link.

My understanding of MK Ultra was basically the government wasted a lot of money because of fear of missing out vs the Soviets. It didn't accomplish anything.

And subliminal marketing has been widely debunked to my knowledge. People thought it might do something, but experimentally it didn't.

I would have pointed to disinformation campaigns myself - there is research that implies it works.

[–] manitcor@lemmy.intai.tech -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

SPE shows exactly how when you alter a worldview how that person changes. It was extreme and unintended but it showed how powerful it can be when the subjects willingly accept the game.

subliminal marketing in the form of showing single image frames was debuked, thats one of many techniques.

[–] jmp242@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

SPE shows that people being paid or encouraged to act a certain way will act a certain way, especially in deference to authority - which we already knew IMO. How does this translate to the Internet - people can be paid to spread info online that might be misleading or straight up disinformation? That doesn't seem especially novel to me. PR and Propaganda existed long before SPE or the 60s.

Do you have any links to what sort of subliminal marketing you're referencing that is shown to work?