this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
3 points (63.6% liked)

New York Times gift articles

507 readers
68 users here now

Share your New York Times gift articles links here.

Rules:

Info:

Tip:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (4 children)

People seem to be making a lot of distinction about whether it was the bullet or shrapnel from something the bullet hit. I don't see how it matters. Someone took a shot at him and got close enough that his ear got tagged. I hate the guy, but this is an academic distinction that doesn't really matter.

[–] revelrous@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 month ago

It's just a play to keep it in the news cycle longer.

[–] halloween_spookster@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

My personal conspiracy theory is that he wasn't hit by anything but instead a secret service agent accidentally hurt his ear when they piled on top of him.

[–] faltryka@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Completely agree. This distinction is immaterial in anyway other than serving up fuel to fanatics who will poorly represent his dissenters.

[–] Today@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

It doesn't matter. Bullets are scary. Shrapnel is scary. What's really ridiculous is his refusal to participate in the investigation. He turned a nothing into a something.