this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
661 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

59582 readers
4407 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] leopold@lemmy.kde.social 27 points 4 months ago (3 children)

this is just going to cause indexers to ignore robots.txt

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 21 points 4 months ago

"We always obey the robots.txt"

  • A bunch of corporations that have no accountability and plenty of incentive to just ignore it and have all been caught training AI on off-limits data.
[–] capital@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

Rate limiting could “fix” that unfortunately.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They're likely blocking user agents too, which I think also doesn't have legal enforcement (as in DuckDuckGo can just use "Google" unless they said otherwise.

[–] Natanael 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

LinkedIn tried blocking scraping that way but as long as the scraping isn't burdensome it's basically legal but you can still be bound by TOS and civil claims

https://natlawreview.com/article/hiq-and-linkedin-reach-proposed-settlement-landmark-scraping-case