this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
753 points (98.7% liked)

News

23296 readers
4289 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

THE SENATE UNANIMOUSLY passed a bipartisan bill to provide recourse to victims of porn deepfakes — or sexually-explicit, non-consensual images created with artificial intelligence

The legislation, called the Disrupt Explicit Forged Images and Non-Consensual Edits (DEFIANCE) Act — passed in Congress’ upper chamber on Tuesday.  The legislation has been led by Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), as well as Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) in the House.

The legislation would amend the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) to allow people to sue those who produce, distribute, or receive the deepfake pornography, if they “knew or recklessly disregarded” the fact that the victim did not consent to those images.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 11111one11111@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

—It's not a Libertarian thing to me as much as it's a 'politicians don't understand firearms thing.'

—It's not a Libertarian thing to me as much as it's a 'politicians don't understand healthcare thing.'

—It's not a Libertarian thing to me as much as it's a 'politicians don't understand medical thing.'

[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 9 points 3 months ago (2 children)

🎯

This kind of argument is always just a thought-terminator. No actual argument for why the law is bad, just a low-effort jab that lawmakers are too stupid to pass a good law.

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's okay, I'm pretty sure they are simply showing that Libertarian ideology is based in a mistrust of politicians — and to a degree, they're right. I don't typically promote or discuss the ideology. I just think as I currently watch YouTube videos on the nuances of cybersecurity, that it's so easy for well-informed professional experts to make far reaching mistakes, that it seems absurd to expect uneducated politicians to create regulations that are simultaneously targeted enough to not cause excess issues while still broad enough to effectively reduce the unwanted behavior.

I still think back to Clinton arguing that regulating the internet was akin to "nailing jello to the wall."

[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago

I still think back to Clinton arguing that regulating the internet was akin to “nailing jello to the wall.”

But the internet is extremely well regulated, thanks to organizations like ICANN & IANA whose entire existence is the result of a U.S. Department of Commerce contract to properly regulate names, addresses, and routing tables. Failure to obey the rules will get your peering agreements terminated, and sever you from the Internet. Failure to cut off rule violators can get you in trouble.

It's what makes sure ISPs don't break the Internet doing arbitrary shit, and keeps shady groups from improperly routing internet traffic through their datacenters without consequences.

I think just revisiting the point that politicians aren't going to be exact when talking about highly technical things like this, and that Clinton very likely meant "The Web" and not "The Internet".

[–] 11111one11111@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Because I don't want to take the time going through every legislative framework I just listed to cite the shitpile of mistakes and revisions or because youve never read the pile of redacted and revised subparagraphs found in every single regulatory legislation? The fact you think it's that simple to compile proof shows you have never read any actual legislative documents. If you want proof, ill list off the top of my head the shit NYS fucked up because Ive read them some what recently:

SAFE Act:

-Original framework had no ban on high capacity magazines because they thought magazines were disposable and as long as they banned the sale the existing HCM's would be phased out.

-Required AR registration with no system to enforce it, then continued to deny all FOIL requests and judicial requests of the number of registered AR's because the turnout was so dismal.

-Issues red flag laws that have no method of enforcement or way of including when a person is a red flag offender on the background check performed at point of sale.

-Added the requirement for pistol permit applicants to have range training but never amended the part of the law that bans anyone from using a pistol without being approved for a pistol permit.

-They couldn't appropriately define imminent danger and had the state supreme court overturn the regulation entirely

Recreational Marijuana: seriously just fuckin google this one. It's so embarrassing how bad they botched the entire thing.

-NYS had millions of dollars of marijuana crops with nowhere to go because they released tons of farming licenses and barely any dispensary licenses.

honestly I'm not taking the time to list all of these. Google it and you will see resounding incompetence.

[–] joyjoy@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] 11111one11111@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

I barely understand how any of the instances stuff work. What is lemmy.one and why should I be on it?

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Politicians understand Healthcare and guns, they just don't care about the fallout.