this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2024
869 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

58072 readers
4612 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemm.ee
fry@fry.gs
L3s@fry.gs
enu@lemmy.world
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
869
CrowdStrike offers a $10 apology gift card to say sorry for outage | Some of the people said that when they went to redeem the offer, they got an error message saying the voucher had been canceled (techcrunch.com)
submitted 1 month ago by ForgottenFlux@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
82 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

CrowdStrike, the cybersecurity firm that crashed millions of computers with a botched update all over the world last week, is offering its partners a $10 Uber Eats gift card as an apology, according to several people who say they received the gift card, as well as a source who also received one.

On Wednesday, some of the people who posted about the gift card said that when they went to redeem the offer, they got an error message saying the voucher had been canceled. When TechCrunch checked the voucher, the Uber Eats page provided an error message that said the gift card “has been canceled by the issuing party and is no longer valid.”

On Friday, CrowdStrike released a faulty update that rendered around 8.5 million Windows devices unusable, according to Microsoft. The update caused the affected computers to be stuck at the infamous “blue screen of death,” or BSOD, a bright blue error screen with a message that is shown when Windows crashes or cannot load because of a critical software failure.

The outage caused delays at airports in Amsterdam, Berlin, Dubai, and London, and across the United States. It also caused several hospitals to halt surgeries, and paralyzed countless businesses all over the world.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 32 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Wow... fuck....

Is there a term for this? Giving someone something and then taking it back? I mean, there's "Indian Giving", but I want one that isn't racist, outdated, and based on a poor understanding of US History?

[–] aalvare2@lemmy.world 51 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If there’re no other alternatives, then I propose that going forward the new term for this should be “Crowd Striking”

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I feel like CrowdStrike did some much groundbreakingly stupid shit that this term will be too ambiguous...

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

But “Indian Giving” as a concept was just a way to excuse giving the indians a deal then renegging on it everytime the wind blew. Classic projrction propaganda before it was invented by ivy leauge schools.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 11 points 1 month ago

Indeed, that's why I was asking for a non-offensive version of the term to apply when people actually give you something and take it back.

[–] Taniwha420@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I believe that "Indian Giving" is sourced in a cultural misunderstanding between Indigenous and European societies. Indigenous societies were reciprocity based, so giving gifts should be reciprocated with a gift of like value to strengthen relationships, or increase honour (social standing). The Europeans were working in a patron-client system so a gift was seen as a way of purchasing access to power through a patron. The Europeans thought the Indigenous people were paying for access to power (like a tributary), so there's no expectation of returning a like gift. The indigenous people thought they were entering into a mutual relationship, and when a like gift wasn't returned that was seen as reneging, so they took back their 'offer'.

Glad to have an anthropologist kick my ass.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Ill ask around local MMA gyms

[–] Oaksey@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Short-term gifter

[–] KingJalopy@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

You misspelled long term grifter