this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2024
94 points (79.0% liked)

Programming

17313 readers
108 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Not my blog, but the author's experience reminded me of my own frustrations with Microsoft GitHub.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kissaki@programming.dev 20 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

The only issue they mention is browser page text search not working on rendered file view (blame).

The feels legacy conclusion doesn't make any sense to me.

GitHub is not the only platform implementing virtual scrolling, partial rendering of rendered files. There's a reason they do that: Files can get big, and adding various code highlighting and interactivity costs performance. It's not a local code representation and rendered canvas. It's rendered into a DOM and DOM representation, with markup and attached logic. Which at some point quickly becomes very inefficient or costly.

Not being able to use the browser text search is an unfortunate side effect.

I consider it a worsening modernization/feature addition. That's the opposite of legacy. We're moving forward (in a bad way), not stagnating.

When I click Blame, and then press Ctrl+F, it opens not my browser text search but the in-page in-file search. It works for me. (Not that I always use that search or like it.)

[–] anyhow2503@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

It would certainly help if the GitHub code search wasn't utter garbage.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

There’s a reason they do that: Files can get big

Oh, boy. Wouldn't it be great if servers had a way to discover the size of the files on their storage without having to read them?

adding various code highlighting and interactivity costs performance

Somebody, quick, there's work to be done on language theory so that we learn how to do those things with a cost just proportional to the file size!

(No way! Who is that Chomsky guy you keep telling me about?)

[–] bitfucker@programming.dev 3 points 3 months ago

Dude, his point is that if you did not implement partial rendering on a big file, the browser will have to work extra hard to render that shit. Not to mention if you add any interactivity on the client side like variable highlighting that needs to be context aware for each language... that basically turns your browser into VSCode, at that point just launch the browser based vscode using the . shortcut.

It's not a matter of the server side of things but rather on the client side of things.

[–] lmaydev@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Don't really get your point here.

They virtualize the file because it's big. They know the size.

It does indeed scale with the size of the file. That's exactly the problem.