whenyellowstonehasitsday

joined 3 months ago
[–] whenyellowstonehasitsday@fedia.io 3 points 2 months ago (11 children)

what is the force you imagine that is stopping the us enforcing a no fly zone over israel?

[–] whenyellowstonehasitsday@fedia.io 5 points 2 months ago (5 children)
  • the us can do anything it wants to its allies
  • no, because ukraine
  • what about ukraine
  • they supply them arms

you're saying that, because the us can't get involved in a conventional war against russia, that they can't stop supplying arms to israel

legitimately what is wrong with your brain, this is fascinating

[–] whenyellowstonehasitsday@fedia.io 3 points 2 months ago (6 children)

you're right the us cannot unilaterally revoke a defense contract that is not a thing they are physically capable of doing

[–] whenyellowstonehasitsday@fedia.io 1 points 2 months ago (8 children)

the US was brought into that conflict

yeah, they were brought into the conflict and then helped to enforce the no-fly zone by bombing pro-libyan-government positions with cruise missiles

[–] whenyellowstonehasitsday@fedia.io 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

nope, none of my comments on this thread involve the word "ukraine"

yours do, though, and you were the first to bring it up

[–] whenyellowstonehasitsday@fedia.io 1 points 2 months ago (10 children)

and the un could vote to put people on the ground

are you okay?

[–] whenyellowstonehasitsday@fedia.io 0 points 2 months ago (10 children)

"the f22 is demonstrably the most advanced air superiority fighter the world has ever seen, and the us could deploy them in situ if they wanted" vs "nuh uh"

BORING try again

[–] whenyellowstonehasitsday@fedia.io 1 points 2 months ago (7 children)

no please elaborate

[–] whenyellowstonehasitsday@fedia.io 1 points 2 months ago (10 children)

oh no cringe

American and British naval forces fired over 110 Tomahawk cruise missiles, and imposed a naval blockade.

[–] whenyellowstonehasitsday@fedia.io 7 points 2 months ago (4 children)

yes i am sure russia, china or europe, the rest of the world's leading arms manufacturers, will willingly sell arms to a us ally that the us has refused to sell arms to

[–] whenyellowstonehasitsday@fedia.io 1 points 2 months ago (4 children)

"global nuclear war" with israel, a country with a nuclear arms program so small it doesn't even officialy exist, and without a delivery system

yes this makes sense

[–] whenyellowstonehasitsday@fedia.io 1 points 2 months ago (14 children)

the US doesn't control any of this territory, and the US is not on the ground here.

and they could if they wanted to

i think you forgot the question you were asking?

view more: ‹ prev next ›