I'd honestly be interested to see a cohorent argument as to why the first two aren't true if not voting is. I can't think of one.
The last one I threw in there for fun.
Even if he had, you still wouldn't know if he had.
The UK has some real cabbage head PMs cycling through, and shot themselves in the foot by leaving the EU.
Trump served a four year term as president.
People already are starting to forget somebody just took a shot at trump. I don't think the 18 month cycle was ever necessary.
The entwives will leave
I swear to fucking god, even he sounds confused at times.
Big Tim Curry red alert 3 energy
I imagine somebody well connected enough to be an envoy doesn't share in the living conditions of the average citizen
I'm not saying they'll do it, I'm saying it's incorrect to state that there's no valid strategic target when there absolutely is.
Ukraine?
Striking inside their territory won't matter all that much if they can just nuke Kiyv.
And breaking the nuclear taboo is a catastrophe for everybody, regardless of who the target is.
But I'm not miserable about Harris? I just told you that.
Or are you trying to say that making any comments that don't end with a string of ๐ emojis is off the table for the next 3 to 5 working days ?
I get that maybe you misinterpreted my comment as anti-harris, since I didn't bother to make my specific stance clear and kind of threw it out there, but I've now clarified.
Why are you doubling down now? Just to try and retroactively justify some unnecessary receipt pulling?
๐๐๐๐๐