tacoface

joined 1 year ago
[–] tacoface 4 points 1 year ago

Also if you spend time with chickens, you realize without a doubt that birds = dinosaurs. Especially if you raise them from chicks, their awkward teenage stage is like half bird, half lizard anyway.

[–] tacoface 6 points 1 year ago

Ask your manager/boss if they want feedback about the training process and make it as specific and constructive as possible. If they don’t want it, you need to consider what to do with what you now know.

[–] tacoface 3 points 1 year ago

We are from Scandinavia and right now we are in the Alps, later we are going to Italy.

There’s been work on the railways that has changed our itinerary and caused some delays but otherwise it has been ok.

We are not huge travelers but previously we’ve driven in our little car or flown and rented a car (ie Iceland, visiting family in the US). My main concern was changing so many trains with children and luggage but they’ve done really well (they are tweens). They are used to trains though.

Pros:

  • I don’t have to drive for hours and hours (I am the only driver in the family)
  • not having to go through security, also we have been inside the Schengen area so no passport controls
  • you can get up and move around in the trains and it is more comfortable than in a plane
  • not as much queueing as at airports
  • night trains can save an overnight at a hotel
  • you get to see the landscape you are crossing, and even if it is just fields or industry it is better than freeway or clouds
  • other travelers seem more chill and less stressed than when flying

Cons:

  • you can’t bring as much with you as in your car and you have to handle your own luggage when changing
  • there’s still waiting around and risk of missed connections
  • it takes more travel time out of the total itinerary than flying
  • still risk of motion sickness especially with seats where your back is to the direction you’re traveling
  • still not cheap

I would do it again but there are still some destinations where I would prefer to drive, such as far out in the countryside or where the public transportation is not great.

[–] tacoface 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

We’re on vacation and it’s 100% public transportation from beginning to end, the kids are doing pretty good with schlepping their bags on and off trains.

[–] tacoface 5 points 1 year ago

I have a cuddle chicken, too. They are the best.

[–] tacoface 2 points 1 year ago

TIL - thanks for the elaboration!

[–] tacoface 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I’ve never seen a tree popper before, I gather from the pictures it’s like a dandelion iron for small trees?

[–] tacoface 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The second one here is great and really stands out from the other submissions, especially with the non-pastel colour scheme.

[–] tacoface 3 points 1 year ago

The second one is really good!

[–] tacoface 2 points 1 year ago

Paving stones/cobbles seem to work much better than concrete and asphalt. They are very durable (stone), can be put down in different patterns, and if you need to do maintenance on underground stuff you can just rip them up and then replace the same stones when you’re done. They also appear to be more frost stable.

[–] tacoface 2 points 1 year ago

How important is it to focus on native vs non-invasive plants in a European context? I live in Scandinavia but come originally from North America and in NA there can be a pretty intense ideal of native plant gardening that I don’t experience the same way here. Ex, lavender is not native to Scandinavia and nobody seems to care.

If you have anything to say on the subject of drought tolerant plants and grasses suitable for Northern Europe I’d love to hear it.

[–] tacoface 6 points 1 year ago

I think it’s also important to have a diversity of aesthetics and cultural representations to gain a more universal appeal - and also that diversity needs to be understood very broadly. Movements like this seem to typecast themselves relatively quickly, as there are few role models available and people adopt an aesthetic, or mannerisms, or jargon as a sort of identifier that they belong to the group, which ends up being just as exclusionary as it is a marker of inclusion.

There will always be people who see the extreme version as wildly inspiring, and those who see it as ugly or frightening or wildly unrealistic. Ex: earthships - personally I think it’s awesome to have a self-sufficient space with indoor gardens, but they are huge and ugly af. But people renovating and retrofitting their century old houses with natural materials and respect for the original architecture? Yes please.

I guess I’m trying to say that the fantastic needs to have a place under the umbrella alongside the pragmatic, and the vegans alongside the people with turkeys in their backyard, and the DIY permies alongside people who would never ever use an old bathtub as a planter but are willing to xeriscape their front lawn with native perennials, and the people who make their own sandals out of bicycle tubes alongside the people who buy really expensive shoes for life etc etc.

view more: ‹ prev next ›