supertrucker

And a strongman dictator usually beats socialism

The Nvidia-Singer 8750

America anger is similar, but the lat one is ' puts the tea in the harbor'

The problem is that humans are the representatives, and they represent their interests first and foremost. You could get A.I. as our overlords, but they will represent the interests of those that program them. If that day ever arrives, I'm investing in Pepsico and Frito-Lays

The scarcity is not in the production outside of demand items (electricity, water, etc) but in distribution. Things like bad infrastructure, war, corruption are the true hinderance

Unless you can create a society that is completely satisfied with fulfilling their basic needs and nothing more, you will have scarcity at some point

Welcome. You're just in time for lunch

You would need essentially a religious like structure to either persuade or psychologically force people to buy into that

Look around you. Under what you just proposed, they decide what to produce. What you will see is a lot of people starving, because most undesirable activities that are essential to modern urban living will go unattended. By the way, you cannot have an anarchist structure trying to co-exist along side a central government structure. Eventually, the central government will overwhelm the anarchist, especially the first time something goes wrong

Good idea. Read about a hypothetical economic theory that is impossible to implement unless everyone become obedient to a small group of elitist while pretending the people are in control. I'm sure you'll get it right this time

I thought the devil created Chihuahuas with that chance

That's the problem with both religion and politics. If you think you're right and everyone else is wrong, you can't help but to I fringe on other people's right to practice. That's why anyone that thinks a leftist government can be a democracy with opposition political parties is at best wrong