Why do you think a union would be involved in moving stolen vehicles, especially in any sort of decision-making capacity (ie, deciding to support this type of crime)? Is there any evidence to support your allegations of criminal activity?
streetfestival
Thanks for posting this. I think you're right. I was getting bad-reddit-like vibes from the recent AMA posts. One thing I like about the fediverse is how real posts and comments are (compared to corporate-controlled social media)
In a very superficial way, yes; in a meaningful way, not at all imo. In response to Black Lives Matter, "all lives matter" was a way of delegitimizing a marginalized group's fight for justice and equality. Recognizing all victims of war and not strictly NATO soldiers (ie the red poppy) is about including more marginalized people in our memorializing, not fewer. It's quite opposite to "all lives matter" actually
This happened in Canada, not the US, but I agree with the US healthcare issues you mentioned
"This doctor billed the Ministry for over 23,000 vaccines over 5 days, incorrectly billing the Ministry for $630,000, 21 times their eligible payments."
Those vaccines were not administered by her or her staff, but by local medical students, and not in her office, both of which apparently go against billing codes.
I'm not sure I agree with seizure of all funds here, and the vaccine clinics did good, but I think the doctor intended to misuse billing codes and I understand why the Ministry wants some money back. There should have been more communication and compromise earlier on. Like, if a doctor bills the province for $100,000 for a day's services that should raise a flag
Great insights!
Shocked, saddened here.
I can't believe Trump did so well. He'll be the first Republican to win the popular vote since 2004. He's a racist, sexist, transphobic, fascist, anti-science rapist, convicted felon, climate change-denier, and champion of the uber wealthy.
I guess there are many more deeply racist and sexist people than I wish to believe. It's BS how first-past-the-post and the electoral college systems work - it's so very easy to manipulate the system when you know the precious few key areas in advance to try to influence. Control of mainstream news and social media by the billionaire gives dis-, misinformation, and other bias so much reach to undermine democracy and voters' rational self-interest.
I hope the Liberals and NDP learn from Trump's surprisingly good results. Populism is really big right now and any party not embracing that as a means of staying relevant will not stand a chance of forming a government imo. (See the carbon rebate debacle, for example. I don't like this, but it's how I see things in the era of most people getting their news on billionaire-run social media platforms). Unfortunately, I do not foresee Trudeau stepping aside or acting with any 'shape up or ship out' pressure to adapt
Thank you for posting this
I think that following the passage of sensible legislation preventing fossil fuel companies from lying in advertisements about how green they are, they are now using new tactics.
I saw a similar billboard to the one in the Narwhal article in Toronto this week. It said some bullshit like "A strong oil and gas sector means more for all Canadians". LMFAO
to clean up a mess they directly contributed to and made worse
Not only that but they spend so much money on advertising and lobbying to undermine public understanding and remediation of. These 'pillage the planet now and deny all negative effects' assclowns are the last people who should be given money to address aspects of the climate crisis. They need federal oversight, not funding
The privacy violations seem egregious to me. Then there's the fact that this bill will secure pensions for 80 politicians by pushing the next election back a week. Why doesn't the electorate trust politicians more? /s
I think political parties love where politics is at. It's become about data collection and copious personalized advertising to 'key voters' (ie, small groups of voters that heavily and unfairly sway overall results in first-past-the-post style elections). Policy and party identity are passé and not as easy to game the system and be reactionary with. It's easier to buy votes (via personalized advertising) than it ever was before this era of social media saturation, I think.
I'm in my 30s and I reject these sort of privacy violations (and freedom of reach), in part because I remember how much ownership and privacy consumers used to enjoy. Now, we can't access many services without handing over gobs of our data, and because we often pay for licenses versus actual goods (eg, netflix) we are at the whims of companies when they want to change their services, increase fees (eg, surge pricing), or change end-user agreements.
I make a point of my age, because when I talk to people in their 20s and younger, they often don't see things like I do; my privacy-centric views seem strange to them. For people who've experienced puberty and onwards with multiple mainstream social media platforms, they seem to regard this relationship with products and companies as completely normal. Good news for the oligarchs.