rosymind

joined 1 year ago
[–] rosymind@leminal.space 17 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] rosymind@leminal.space 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

"Sexual Content Policy Update DEC 15, 2023← All Posts

1920x1080_header_ts_shield_ice.jpg

Author: Dan Clancy

On Wednesday, we updated our Sexual Content Policy. Our primary goal in making these updates was to make our guidelines easier to understand and enforce.

Part of this update included changes to how we treat fictionalized nudity. For years, through UserVoice and in conversations, we heard from artists that our content policies were limiting. In making this update, we were trying to be responsive to these requests and allow the thriving artist community on Twitch to utilize the human form in their art.

First, we want to make clear that some streamers, in response to this update, created content that was in violation of our new policy. We’ve worked quickly to remove that content and issue channel enforcements.

However, there also was a great deal of new content that was allowed under the updated policy. Much of the content created has been met with community concern. These are concerns we share. Upon reflection, we have decided that we went too far with this change. Digital depictions of nudity present a unique challenge–AI can be used to create realistic images, and it can be hard to distinguish between digital art and photography.

So, effective today, we are rolling back the artistic nudity changes. Moving forward, depictions of real or fictional nudity won’t be allowed on Twitch, regardless of the medium. This restriction does not apply to Mature-rated games. You can find emote-specific standards for nudity and sexual content in the Emote Guidelines. We aren’t making other changes to the updated Sexual Content Policy.

We are in the process of pushing out updates to our Community Guidelines that reflect this change. It will take a few days for both this blog and for the new Community Guidelines to be translated.

While I wish we would have predicted this outcome, part of our job is to make adjustments that serve the community. I apologize for the confusion that this update has caused."

[–] rosymind@leminal.space 5 points 11 months ago

This is not the future I envisioned as a kid

[–] rosymind@leminal.space 8 points 11 months ago (4 children)

What I want to read from Putin is: "I'm withdrawing my troops from Ukraine"

[–] rosymind@leminal.space 10 points 11 months ago (4 children)

I find it frustrating when people make a statement, and then say they aren't interested in hearing a specific group's opinion. It's rude af.

[–] rosymind@leminal.space 43 points 11 months ago (19 children)

I mean, society did fail her but that doesn't mean she shouldn't take responsibility for what happened. She left her gun in her purse, unsecured, around a six year old with serious mental health issues. She is absolutely liable. That doesn't mean that she is the only one to blame, tho

[–] rosymind@leminal.space 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This never ceases to make me smile, no matter how many times it's reposted

[–] rosymind@leminal.space 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I feel like politicians are taking advantage of how short the average U.S. person's attention span is. (Mine included)

"LOOK OVER HERE" politician says, as they do a bad thing in the opposite direction

"Hey, wait a minute..." Some people

"HEY LOOK AT THAT GUY" politician to one of the people noticing

And the heads just keep turning, the pitchforks keep coming out, and soon it's a jumbled mess of misinformation, distraction, confusion and in-fighting.

How do we even begin to fix it?

[–] rosymind@leminal.space 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm certain that they didn't mean to kill the three Jewish hostages. However, the fact that they went in guns blazing without a care to whether or not the people they were shooting were innocent or not... well, that's sadly very telling

[–] rosymind@leminal.space 2 points 11 months ago

I love the simplicity and directness of this answer

[–] rosymind@leminal.space 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yes! Can we pin this somewhere for new Lemmy users to read? I'm so over the right/wrong ONLY attitudes

[–] rosymind@leminal.space 3 points 11 months ago (20 children)

What if someone suddenly inherited 1bn from an estranged relative, or if they won the lottery? I'd say that's an ethical way of gaining that much wealth

I think what defines an ethical billionare from one that isn't, is how much they share with everyone else and how much they consume for themselves. Spending that much money properly would take time. They'd have to vet charities, hire people to help them spend it on the best things, research where to invest in (i'm talking about things like green energy) etc.

Just food for thought. I tend to like looking for exceptions to rules (idk why)

view more: ‹ prev next ›