peopleproblems

joined 1 year ago
[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 24 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Two so far.

Remember, they have discovered 42 plots against Hitler.

And they didn't have nearly as sophisticated means of communication that time.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 10 points 12 hours ago

We're all simply traitors for being on this site.

We're traitors for having Signal installed.

We're traitors for voting against him.

We're traitors for deleting twitter, and Facebook.

We're traitors for being a registered Democrat.

We're traitors for supporting the rights of LGBTQ and minoties.

We're traitors because we dissent.

If the above is what constitutes a traitor, I'd rather die a traitor than participate in any support of the harm they will do.

I'd rather not die of course.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

It's not a hard problem to solve. It's not hard to see the reasoning behind a desire for self driving cars. Anyone who lives outside of a big city in the US knows this.

Roads are already present. Traffic control is already present.

Tie the goddamn roads to the goddamn traffic control and have it coordinate the cars. The cars input their destination, and have radar to stop the car to prevent accidental collision.

The problem is people don't like that they can't get to their destination faster, they don't have the freedom of choosing their exact route, and they can't just rev their engine whenever they want.

It's not mass transit, but it solves the final distance problem.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 14 points 16 hours ago

I am aware.

350m people have been affected by it in the US. With the ties we have to Europe, it's already been happening.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 134 points 18 hours ago (6 children)

The biggest problem is the damage is done.

The party holds the supreme court. House. Senate. Executive. Under the unitary executive theory, the rest of the federal government, while being completely inept, will be party members.

All we can do now, is collectively survive. It's a death cult. Steps we take to prevent the detainment, torture and death of our neighbors, friends, and family are the biggest fuck you to these people.

I don't know how we'll do it. But we don't do it by joining or tolerating them. We don't have to make it easy for them.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Dicks out!

We got the bad timeline for sure.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That's the Republican "symbol." Democrats are a donkey.

No, that's silly. You'll both be campers at "Liberty Rehabilitation Camp!"

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (3 children)

So many innocent people. Is it normal to preemptively cry for those who haven't event been captured yet?

They may or may not know it.. They'll end up in kangaroo court, and sent to a camp and we won't find out what happens after that.

Dictators don't typically take too kindly to filibusters.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 57 points 1 day ago (3 children)

On the bright side, they don't get the civil war they desired.

What's a little systematic mass murder right?

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Oh that part's easy.

Money.

California has economic power over the rest of the US because of the money that flows through it.

 
 
 

I didn't care for the musical nature of it. That aside:

The first 'Joker' clearly established that the main character was Arthur Fleck. Clearly suffering from mental illness as a result of abuse growing up, and the people he murdered were abusing him in some way. To me, as a long time Batman fan, this 'Joker' was anything but Joker.

  1. He didn't take pleasure in chaos.
  2. He wasn't anti-batman in anyway.
  3. A clear back story that lined up with his behaviors.
  4. Clearly a dude pushed too far (kind of like Killing Joke, but it didn't line up with that character's style).

However, when he was in the 'Joker' role, he became clear headed and focused. So now the 'Joker' clearly isn't Joker but the beginning of Joker?

In Folie A Deux, we see him continue to be abused, still having strange fantasies, a system failing around him, and noticably the 'Joker' character is resonating with people fed up with all sorts of bullshit. The collective desire to burn it down and restart - very common theme within the Batman comics and joker. We see Harley Quinzel introduced, and as we discover throughout the movie - this is the actual Harley Quinn Psychiatry, brilliance, obsessed with Joker to the point that when Arthur says it was just something he made up to do what he thought he needed, she quit him. The last parts of the movie tie is completely together. Ricky, who is killed by the only guard that is sometimes nice, breaks Arthur, realizing murder happens to those undeserving by those who 'shouldnt' be doing it.

Joker escapes after the court room explosion (with a burned Harvey Dent, that was badass). He's rescued by enthusiasts, who he escapes from. He encounters Quinn and she says that his "fantasy was all that mattered, and it's gone."

When the Joker is murdered at the end by the psychopath, he starts it with a retelling of the joke Arthur told Murray. Albeit, one that was significantly better delivered. He also notably uses a knife, and is laughing the whole time, and gives himself a scarred smile. This man, (if Warner Bros could ever finish a good DC series) would likely continue to be an evolution of 'Joker'.

This all works because:

  1. Joker rarely has a back story, and famously is stated to prefer his origin to be "Multiple Choice."
  2. Several comics and media (Notably the Arkham series of video games) explore how Joker is not confined to a single person. Unlike Batman who has very specic goals, values, and traumatic origin, Joker is a shared 'idea' between these individuals that reject the value of civilization at all.
  3. Harley Quinzel was only introduced in the 90s, but her main obsession with Joker evolved over time as he abused her, or burned things she learned to care for, but seemingly remained obsessed because of some 'fantasy' she provided him, UNTIL he broke that fantasy and she quit him abruptly just like in the movie.

I don't think it was a great movie. But it actually reimagined the same Joker story in a new way that I did thoroughly enjoy. And it left it plenty open for more stories from it, just as all good DC stories do.

 

This is what I do for work I guess

 
 

It will still break them if you try it

 
 

I'm talking like one person brought in all the money for a decade, then a divorce happens. Some of it makes sense - a house with mortgage, one spouse buys the other out of the house. Which is great, but if one spouse doesn't have the income to take a loan out to buy the other, does that mean that the spouse who does have the income has the choice to buy out or sell?

Similarly, things like 401ks and pensions I imagine you can't just take out half the cash in them and give that to their spouse. Or does that have to be a loan for the amounts in those plans?

Is it debt all the way down for both?

 
 

Let me set the stage: Newly single dad of a young kid. After COVID-19 I haven't done much outside of my home and taking care of my kid. I work full time-remote, and between the kiddo and leaving room for a hobby or taking care of the house, it seems like the only other thing I have time for is sleep.

The thing I know is that this is likely an issue with my anxiety and anxious attachment. The conclusion we've arrived at in therapy is that I gotta meet people. I apparently forgot, or don't know how to do that. Where to meet people. It's not a big city, but 200k-300k people in the county.

Maybe I'm looking for something of a strategy more than anything.

edit: thank you guys, I really appreciate it!

 
 
view more: next ›