omenmis

joined 1 year ago
 

I read the linked article recently and it got me thinking about how we approach policing in traffic stops. To summarize the article, it is reporting a new law that limits police power to stop vehicles for expired registration or nonfunctioning headlights. According to the bill's author, this was written to reduce the racial bias in traffic stops, which is a great idea. However, I think this bill targets the wrong areas for improvement.

I personally disagree with because I believe cars should have extra burdens in exchange for operating such a deadly machine. That includes basic traffic stops for operating them in an unsafe manner, and as such I will mainly be focused on the headlight portion of the law. However, the people who I sided with in the article were GOP, who opposed it on a very different principle. They opposed the bill because of how traffic stops can be used as pretext to catch criminals, not because making people operate dangerous machinery safely was a priority.

It was this along with quotes in the article about how racialized traffic stops are that got me thinking. What is the purpose of traffic stops? To me, traffic stops should be to discourage driving dangerously or operating vehicles in dangerous ways. To police, and to some GOP politicians, it seems like traffic stops are pretext to commit search, seizure, and other questionably constitutional actions. Of course both parties unfairly target minorities, mainly black people in their traffic stops.

Of course, this doesn't even touch the many scandals of officers using a traffic stop to plant evidence to punish "undesiriables".

My main question for this thread is "Why?" Why are traffic stops used as a pretext for searches and seizures. The other question I have is, "What direction should stopping the overpolicing of traffic stops take?"

[–] omenmis@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

we can see your comment and comment back because lemmy.ml federates with beehaw.

i love nimbys. block anything that improves qol because property values. recently nimbys tried to fight an in progress light rail extension due to crime concerns and now their entire city probably wont get a rail connection until they give up.

[–] omenmis@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

i live in a majority sfh zoned streetcar suburb, however the area is majority walkable and not too awful for biking as a confident adult because of the grid roads for the walkable portion.

however, we are surrounded on all sides outside of this pocket of grid streets by poorly zoned sfh dominated by no sidewalk cul de sacs and 4 lane stroads with painted door zone bike lanes. the most notable areas are anywhere particularly north (rich people so literally no sidewalk) and near freeway interchanges. our south freeway interchange is the worst of them because its very stroady and has an auto dealership next to it. the others dont even try to pretend theyre not highway interchanges.

 
[–] omenmis@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

my picture has been nuked, beehaw has 1486'd my stuffed animals

4
idiot rule (beehaw.org)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by omenmis@beehaw.org to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
 

he fall

 

who made this hell game and how do i become the girl on the right ??????

[–] omenmis@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

the reason we arent discussing it is from the article itself.

The latest version of the bill aims to address those concerns by requiring cities to destroy all photographic evidence “that does not contain evidence of a speeding violation ... within five business days.”

if companies/cities choose to violate this law, then we have easy recourse.

 

hoping all of these pass, especially the one related to transport and climate.

[–] omenmis@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

damn the right about to make two new parties frfr, are we sure they arent the left?

[–] omenmis@beehaw.org 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

not pictured is the FFT of this diagram, where the engineers reside

[–] omenmis@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

i have good news because its not set at the speed limit but 11 over, so you only get the ticket for recklessly speeding. maybe the speed limits get lowered so people arent driving 55 next to sidewalks. is that really such a big deal?

[–] omenmis@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

why not? CA has struggled with record levels of traffic injury and death in recent years.

11
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by omenmis@beehaw.org to c/citylife@beehaw.org
 

hoping this catches on, pretty please CA...

i like the fact that the money can only go into maintaining the speed cameras or into making the road safer. those are both things desperately needed, especially in LA.

[–] omenmis@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

you can spout incorrect shit, but you'll probably be banned. Freedom of speech and freedom of association go hand in hand, and admins here will deplatform you much the same way a KKK member at a comedy club will be shown the door.

[–] omenmis@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

this story is really sad because its happening in the modern day when we know generally that this kind of development will not fix traffic. DOTs seem to me like they're more like a department of cars...

[–] omenmis@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I worked at a place that did this. We only saw the tips in the jar go to our pocket, we never saw the online or digital tips.

 

🥺🥺🥺🥺

[–] omenmis@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It takes 2 pause cycles, that's essentially O(1) compared to a cache miss.

 

Huge game changer for LA! Now union station serves almost every line!

 

Game changer just dropped!

 

Just wondering how people here get around day-to-day.

I personally try to use a bike as much as possible, but end up driving because of the structure of US suburbia and being the friend with a car™.

view more: next ›