Whatever complaint you got about the game, saying that anyone « deserves toxicity » is not the clever take you think it is.
ombremad
joined 1 year ago
Imagine running scam on video views like, 5 years after Facebook’s infamously bs « pivot to video » bombed. What a visionary man.
Nice of Google to let us know we can just use Safari with Adblock, SponsorBlock, DeArrow and Vinegar to have a better experience than with their app.
Yeah I get it too, and I understand there’s nothing wrong with playing the same game for a long time. But a lot of people will get tired of the same game after 10 years. Even chess, not everyone dedicates a lifetime to it.
Nostalgia can be very strong when you have a very strong connection with a game. I miss the times when I ate pizza with my friends and played Rock Band together all night long. I could still play Rock Band, but it’s not the same anymore. What I miss is that point in time, the context, the friends who’re not there anymore. The game hasn’t changed. I did, and my life did.
Si j'avais touché un euro à chaque fois que Le Monde a "refactorisé" discrètement le travail de Mediapart, j'aurais pu ouvrir un Livret A.
I get Minecraft probably played a huge role in your life, and that would explain why you feel so disappointed with it. I don't think it's as bad as you described it, and I don't think it's leaning towards children more than before, but you're talking from a place of nostalgia and I kinda understand that.
I don't know how long you've been playing it but... maybe you've just... outgrown the game? Or got tired of it. You're talking about when Minecraft came out... that was 13 years ago. It's really hard to not lose interest in a game (any game, really) after so much time. Not to mention... you got older, too, and your tastes evolved.
I can't really recommend you another game from your post (your question is way too broad, just play whatever, you don't have to stick to one single game). But maybe you should consider that Minecraft is fine, that you spent maybe too much time with it, that it's time to move on, and to be at peace with it.
Microsoft actually tried that during the 360 era with their "Games for Windows Live" service. You had to pay Live "Gold" in order to play online for those games, the exact same subscription required for online gaming on Xbox.
The whole service was so poorly done, so intrusive, and so un-PC, that it didn't stick with PC gamers.
Nowadays, with quite a few PC gamers already paying for the Game Pass subscription and a rather streamlined experience for PC, I wonder if things would turn out differently somehow.
What? You’re not hurting only the devs here (though, it still wouldn’t be okay to hurt the devs in the first place).
Let’s be honest here. Cities Skylines 2 community is so toxic it’s actually a burden even for players. The Steam forums and most online places dedicated to the game are full of entitled people who, instead of going for another game, spend their days shitting on it. Even going as far as jumping over people actually enjoying the game. That’s what toxicity means. And you can find any excuse you want, it’s not a sane behaviour.