olympus

joined 1 year ago
[–] olympus@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They are focused on AV1. Good, I will focused on it in future, I hope it beats MPEG-LA's VVC.
That's not the point, in case you don't know everybody is focusing on AV1 including Google.
Google is actually the main developer of AV1.
Nobody asks from Mozilla to include software HEVC decoding. They would have to pay a lot of money for it and honestly they shouldn't give to MPEG-LA a single dollar.
They could do what Chromium has done and include ONLY hardware decoding support.
Chromium pays nothing to MPEG-LA for that because they use our own hardware, our graphics card, and the manufacturer of the graphics card has already paid for it.
I also don't see any issue coming from it with widevine, if there isn't any issue from it in Chromium, I don't see why it would cause issues only to Firefox.
They proparly don't have the resources to include support for it. Totally understandable. But I will be selfish on this, my choice of my primary browser would be based on my needs....

[–] olympus@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yes, mv2 is a good example. But not a deal breaker for me because most chromium based browsers have a NATIVE adblocker on them. NATIVE adlocking, you know... ablocking that will never break because Chrome, Edge or Firefox don't have NATIVE adbloking on them and you have to rely on extensions for that.
There is demand for hevc. Just have a look at Jeffylin, Emby or Plex forums. No, Mozilla doesn't care, they have been mulitple requests and they close them all with RESOLVED WONTFIX. People won't keep begging Mozilla, they are just switching to another browser.

[–] olympus@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

First of all jpegxl was an experimental flag and option in chromium, it never made it as a "real" feature in chromium based browsers. Find a better example, that ain't it.
About your other comment, you have no idea how popular Plex, Jellyfin and Emby are. In desktop if they use Firefox they are stuck at re-encoding their videos on the fly to h264 and waste resources and quality. Many of them have no idea that chromium based browsers now support directplay on hevc. Everyday many of them are informed and leave Firefox.

[–] olympus@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

They will. If Apple doesn't comply with EU Digital Markets Act (DMA) they will have to pay fines of up to 10% of a company's global turnover for infringements. Let them try not to comply lol. Their deadline is on May 2024.

[–] olympus@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I could think of 2 reasons

  1. Customization, more features than the default. For example you can rename apps, change icons of apps, organize your apps to categories etc. Something not possible with the default launchers. Yes, other 3rd party support these, but if you already use some Microsoft products like Onedrive, Outlook etc, Microsoft launcher could be a logical option. They already spy you, so...
  2. You are a Microsoft 365 subscriber.
[–] olympus@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (13 children)

For me, until all below are supported Firefox can't be my primary browser.

  1. PWA not supported and only possible with FirefoxPWA. I can't rely to anything but native, Mozilla could break FirefoxPWA any time they want.
  2. I use my browser for my multimedia needs and I use my own Emby Server. Firefox doesn't support mkv container and the most important it desn't support HEVC. Please do not tell me about HEVC royalties and how much Mozilla would have to pay MPEG-LA. Chromium based browsers have enabled hardware HEVC decoding and they pay nothing to MPEG-LA because the royalties have been already payed by my graphics card. Mozilla simply doesn't care.
view more: ‹ prev next ›