noxy

joined 1 year ago
[–] noxy@yiffit.net 0 points 1 month ago

Amazing how I played this on my PC last night, guess I wasn't aware of this new definition for "exclusive". Happy about it tho!

[–] noxy@yiffit.net 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Its good. Not perfect, but better than I expected.

Headphones definitely recommended, a halfway decent Atmos home theater system sounds great but I still picked up subtle sounds better with even just bluetooth headphones.

Ambience is very much on point. Dialogue is a good mix of well-acted, and a tad "off" like the original. Angela and Eddie seem faithfully redone, so far. James too honestly.

Apartments were a nice change-up from the original, not too different thematically but still essentially a whole new layout, not at all a copy and paste job. Showdown with big knife guy was a big departure, though. Not sure if better or worse, but different from the original

Some graphical glitches (something like ghosting of the fog around objects moving on the screen, also flashes of light in the distance) sometimes that are frankly unacceptable for a $70 game, especially a game of this sort of mood, but hopefully they get those patched soon.

Combat is not exactly great. Nor was it in the original, to be fair. The dodging mechanic is a bit much, and at least on the hardest combat difficulty, it feels like you gotta already be familiar with enemy attack patterns, since it doesn't give you much chance to learn and survive. But it does all feel learnable, so we'll see if I just need to get gooder.

Steam achievement notifications at least one broke immersion for me, I might try to mute those next time I play.

But overall I'm very eager to resume playing after work, I left off after the apartments (and stayed up far too late doing so!)

[–] noxy@yiffit.net 7 points 1 month ago (12 children)
[–] noxy@yiffit.net 0 points 1 month ago

don't listen to Crassius Curio

[–] noxy@yiffit.net 4 points 1 month ago

You were part of the problem. I'm glad that's past tense.

[–] noxy@yiffit.net 1 points 1 month ago

Regardless, why bother running or using a short URL service? QR codes can easily hold a full URL and more, and QR codes are not (nor are they meant to be) human readable, so what's the benefit?

[–] noxy@yiffit.net 2 points 1 month ago

what's the difference?

[–] noxy@yiffit.net 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Why is that ideal? Seems more prone to problems if the short URL service shuts down or suffers outages.

[–] noxy@yiffit.net 1 points 1 month ago (4 children)

yeah, qr codes have different levels of error correction that you can specify, could very be well turned up to the max

or the url has a ton of tracking params appended to it for some reason

[–] noxy@yiffit.net 7 points 1 month ago

Me too. I work for none of the above, but yes I would.

[–] noxy@yiffit.net -1 points 1 month ago

Fun fact, rail workers had more demands than just "extra sick days".

view more: ‹ prev next ›