negativenull

joined 11 months ago
[–] negativenull@startrek.website 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I know @ummthatguy has this covered, but I came prepared as well.

[–] negativenull@startrek.website 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Oh man, that is even better! Use this one for sure!!!!

[–] negativenull@startrek.website 4 points 11 months ago

This one was worrying me (11 rikers would be very busy indeed).

Since "Riking" isn't defined, I took some liberty with the final one. I grabbed the screenshots from: here

[–] negativenull@startrek.website 18 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

Eleven Rikers Riking:

[–] negativenull@startrek.website 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

The Orville - Pastafarianism
Galaxy Quest - Rastafarianism

[–] negativenull@startrek.website 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The original series in the 1970s leaned more into Mormon cosmology. The more recent version didn't do that as much, so it's harder to tell.

[–] negativenull@startrek.website 7 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Battlestar Galactica should surly be Mormonism

[–] negativenull@startrek.website 45 points 11 months ago (5 children)

The smoke that comes out of computers sometimes is caused by the little people getting pissed off and lighting little fires out of protest.

[–] negativenull@startrek.website 5 points 11 months ago

DS9 has all sorts of complications that could fit any number of things I think (Bajorans/Prophets, Maquis, Founders, Jem'Hadar, Dominion, etc).

[–] negativenull@startrek.website 4 points 11 months ago

Nice, it's good to get some validation!

[–] negativenull@startrek.website 4 points 11 months ago

That might work better?

 
  • The Supreme Court upheld Washington state's law banning "conversion therapy" for minors, despite dissent from three conservative justices.
  • An appellate panel struck down local bans on conversion therapy in Florida, deeming them an unconstitutional restriction on counselors' speech.
  • Justice Clarence Thomas argued that the court should have taken up the case and considered the First Amendment challenge to the law.
 
 
 
 
171
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by negativenull@startrek.website to c/risa@startrek.website
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
view more: ‹ prev next ›