misk

joined 1 year ago
[–] misk@sh.itjust.works 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

What the actual fuck is wrong with admins of SJW?

Please direct any seething that you may wish to do to the struggle session that's well underway over here.

Thought this instance puts things to vote so yeah, duck you too, goodbye.

[–] misk@sh.itjust.works 36 points 1 year ago

Other than shilling for genocidal regimes I've seen them brigade such posts after they refederated recently. This kind of behavior is unacceptable in my book regardless of what ideology you subscribe to.

[–] misk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm not judging someone who read the entire series or those who did it multiple times. People are free to enjoy what they want. Regardless of that, doing 8 months multiplied by even 2-3 times is a considerable chunk of a human lifespan. It explains takes like "I don't like the adaptation because it made too many changes" and it needs to be put into perspective. I've elaborated more on this in my other comment.

[–] misk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

"This series is 1:1 replica of a book" and "this series is only taking a passing inspiration from original books" are merely facts and a starting point to set expectations before moving on to describe and judge an adaptation. It's okay to judge by comparing original to adaptation but "this is not a faithful adaptation, therefore it is bad" does not help in evaluating quality of derived work.

[–] misk@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I guess it was up to e-scooter renting companies to come up with some kind of geofencing of reasonable parking but they failed to self-regulate which led to everyone being pissed off about them. If those companies were concerned about the spaces they littered they'd probably be still in business.

It's a good sign that abusing good faith is punished with such severity.

[–] misk@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I agree that it's more cybersecruity related but given that this incident led to a food product recall there is a bit of a more broad appeal so I think fits this community.

[–] misk@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No idea, I tried out Bean while it was in open test flight and was confused when the app dev went ahead with advertising this feature once it went paid. It's definitely a standout among other Lemmy clients but unfortunately it's half baked. I remained subscribed to this community to keep an eye out for when it is properly implemented.

[–] misk@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It doesn't work and it's rather misleading to have as a paid feature until it does.

[–] misk@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

I don't believe critique of JK Rowling is left wing extremism although book burning as a form of consumer boycott seems to be rather counterproductive.

[–] misk@sh.itjust.works 56 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

How about banning public book burning in general? Not a lot of good memories related to that.

Want to keep burning books? Have waste collection services provide a pickup point. Then they can do it in some industrial incinerator so you'll have your book burned but without providing media with an easy outrage (unless you wanted outrage?).

Book burning seems to be a tool of right wing extremism, even when it's used against right wing extremists of some other kind, there's very little benefit to the society.

Also obligatory, fuck organized religion.

[–] misk@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, it's surprising since it should have lower CPU overhead. Here's Digital Foundry analysis: https://youtu.be/V9Kc8025H7U

view more: next ›