llamacoffee

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
 

Chojnacki said SpaceX is looking at March 2025 to begin that fueling campaign and “hoping (the) first half of ’25 to be able to see that work.” He said two launch towers at the Starbase facility near Boca Chica Beach will be needed to do that work.

In order to make this work long-term, Launch Complex 39A at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida will need to come into the picture. Chojnacki added that the pace of launch will have to greatly increase, potentially to a bi-weekly cadence.

[–] llamacoffee@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Works on Boost for Android!

[–] llamacoffee@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago

I keep thinking that it must have been half a meter and there was a mistake somewhere, but that's what the source tells us! Insane.

[–] llamacoffee@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

That's so cool!!

[–] llamacoffee@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

First crew dragon launch from SLC40!

[–] llamacoffee@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

I LOVE that already there are enough commercial space missions happening that it's easy to get confused which one is which! The more the merrier imo :)

[–] llamacoffee@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Thanks for sharing the video! I'm always interested in seeing mainstream coverage of this stuff. However, they really don't know what they're talking about. For example, the host says they're going to higher altitudes than the Apollo program, which is just utterly baloney. Really throws a wrench into the credibility of this news outlet, in my view at least.

As for whether this mission is risky, yes it absolutely is. However, all manned space missions are risky and this one doesn't really have anything that makes it fundamentally unsafe.

Look, NASA sets objectives to accomplish its missions to the ISS, and they work with the engineers at SpaceX to figure out how to accomplish them as safely as possible. These Polaris missions are fascinating in that the objectives are set jointly between the SpaceX team and a paying customer.

The customer is interested in a few things, but it probably comes down to fame for doing new things. SpaceX is interested in developing the technologies and raising funds to get to Mars. Where their goals overlap is how we get the Polaris missions. I think that's pretty cool!

[–] llamacoffee@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (3 children)

While the Korea Aerospace Research Institute (KARI) is responsible for developing the satellite bus, Korea’s Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI) is in charge of the payloads.

SpaceX is just launching the satellites.

[–] llamacoffee@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Think a booster will complete 25 flights by the end of the year? I think so. We're close!

[–] llamacoffee@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Personally, I think it's a great thing that the US arguably has the best military surveillance and communication satellites. Certainly I prefer money going there than into literal bullets. In any case, doesn't this have nothing to do with space tourism?

[–] llamacoffee@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Instant upvote. Well played, my friend, well played.

[–] llamacoffee@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

My dear friend, the report is factually false. I can't speak for others, but I personally find it to only be responsible to help dispel false news. And for what it's worth, Elon is an asshole in my view, but that is irrelevant in this context, wouldn't you agree?

As for the facts, you may check them yourself. Here is the actual application. Typo is on page 79, the actual figure is in the appendix on page 177.

https://www.tceq.texas.gov/downloads/permitting/wastewater/title-iv/tpdes/wq0005462000-spaceexplorationtechnologiescorp-starbaselaunchpadsite-cameron-tpdes-adminpackage.pdf

Maybe you're wondering why I am keen on sharing all this. I am a big fan of spaceflight, it's just something I like and find inspiring. False reports that lean heavily on "Elon Musk bad" make the spacefaring future I'm rooting for more difficult to achieve. Surely it's ok to correct misinformation?

view more: next ›