lingh0e

joined 1 year ago
[–] lingh0e@lemmy.film 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you're talking about the children of teachers, they're almost assuredly going to have the same days off.

[–] lingh0e@lemmy.film 2 points 1 year ago
[–] lingh0e@lemmy.film 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A government agency is using a flimsy excuse to extort money from it's citizens, accusing people of a crime without due process... and you've made it clear that you think it's a worthy trade off for the illusion of safer roads.

[–] lingh0e@lemmy.film 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

You can just admit that you want intrusive observation that skips due process because it fits the narrative you want to force on everyone else.

It's okay.

I personally think it's a terrible idea.

[–] lingh0e@lemmy.film 1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

If a person is speeding and unknowingly gets tagged by a speed camera, it doesn't stop their speeding at the time. Hence it is not about safety.

If someone is speeding then slows down just long enough to avoid getting tagged by the speed camera, then resumes speeding, it is not about safety.

If the tickets can be literally thrown in the garbage without a second thought and the issuing party can't do a thing about it, it is not about safety.

There are better ways to make people aware of their driving habits. A shitty unmanned speed camera is not one of those ways.

[–] lingh0e@lemmy.film 1 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Have you read anything I've been writing? It is does not deter speeding. Outside of the 100 yards the camera it's business as usual. People receive tickets AFTER THE FACT. It would be more effective to have actual police enforcing limits ON THE SPOT. They do not care about safety, they are literally just trying to generate money for themselves and their cronies.

[–] lingh0e@lemmy.film 1 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Or maybe the decrease in tickets is because of the giant billboard a local smoke shop erected saying "there's a speed trap here."

Dude, just admit that this speed camera is a blatant cash grab.

[–] lingh0e@lemmy.film 0 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Are you not reading what I said? It doesn't make the area safer. Receiving a ticket WEEKS after the fact does nothing to prevent or curtail the dangerous behavior WHEN IT IS OCCURRING. And it doesn't make the actual street any safer because people slow down for that 100yd stretch then speed back up. Never mind the fact that a huge number of the tickets go straight into the trash.

[–] lingh0e@lemmy.film 2 points 1 year ago (13 children)

I'm speaking from a place of "I drive through Lindale and see this with my own eyes".

[–] lingh0e@lemmy.film 3 points 1 year ago (15 children)

It does nothing to increase safety. Mailing someone a citation after the fact does nothing to stop the crime as it is being done. And, as is the case in Lindale, it doesn't even make any money as a large majority of the recipients just throw them away.

[–] lingh0e@lemmy.film 3 points 1 year ago (17 children)

Lol. Let me introduce you to Lindale, OH.

[–] lingh0e@lemmy.film 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

TIL there's a sequel. That's awesome.

view more: ‹ prev next ›