librechad

I just got charged $165 a couple days ago from two yearly subscriptions I totally forgot I had. We need a better solution. The banks should just implement the usage of Virtual Cards like Privacy.com does. It'd be so much more convent for people to cancel subscriptions, if they're allowed to have multiple different virtual cards that they can easily toggle on or off.

Why don't the banks do this?

It was a little difficult but honestly I just used ChatGPT the entire time

Currently browsing from my Libreboot X60T with Debian GNU/Linux-libre and OpenRC

Don't they store your data?

Maybe this is just me but I used to LOVE fast food, my fat ass would DoorDash Dairy Queen almost everyday during the pandemic. Ended up gaining 50lbs after I had just reached my goal for losing 100lbs-120lbs. I'm 210 now but I miss being around 170. (used to be 300 a couple years ago)

I can say now that I don't eat fast food or Doordash anymore mostly because I feel like I'm eating micro plastic fake meat (may not be entirely true but maybe you know what I mean)

Uncle fucker, you got me.

Very constructive response.

Your accusation of a 'thinly veiled attempt at justifying displays of intolerance' ignores my stated objective: to foster a conversation about how platforms decide what content to remove. I've already acknowledged the mod's removal was warranted due to its author's bigoted comments. My interest lies in examining the broader principles behind such decisions.

However, as Mark Twain once said, 'Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.' It seems we're unlikely to engage in the meaningful dialogue I was hoping for, so perhaps it's best to leave it at that.

You obviously don't live in the city.

In attributing the forthcoming migrant crisis solely to Republicans stance on climate change, you're oversimplifying a complex issue. While climate change is indeed a pressing concern that could exacerbate migration patterns, it's not the only factor. My initial point was that AOC appears to be ignoring the concerns of her constituents on the current migrant issue, which is separate from future crises caused by climate change. It is crucial to address the problems of today while also preparing for those of tomorrow. To do so, our representatives should be open to debate and multiple viewpoints, not solely focused on pushing their own agendas.

While I've already acknowledged that the mod in question was rightly removed due to bigoted comments in its description, that's not the focal point of my inquiry. What I'm driving at is the more general issue of content moderation and what warrants removal. I'm not asking for any form of bigotry to be permitted; I'm questioning how we, as a community, decide what crosses the line. It's curious that you label my pursuit of a nuanced dialogue as 'gross,' especially given the content you freely share. It seems our standards for what is acceptable differ considerably.

@FBI