Really? I didn't know that.

When I did the color shading test I failed crazy with the shades between green and red, including yellow. Obviously I failed the whole board, but that was the worst though.

Can you try to see the difference, because you should see it, with colorblindness the shades are just harder to see? If you actually cannot tell the difference you might have something else than protanomaly, like missing one cone completely rather than a shifted one.

Unless you meant protanopia, rather then protanomaly, the -nopia means a missing cone aka dichromacy, and -nomaly a shifted one I think?

I actually thought it was like a reset button, like when using a browser, pressing home would put you into your home page. If the name was start, like end, I may have tried to actually use it for text editing.

And those who don't want to translate it, "Home" is "Mold" in Finnish, a running joke that the button is never used lol.

translate "home" from finnish to english ;)

I'm severely deutan, even then red and green are a clear difference. Yellow is a bit harder to see, but still visible. Should not be an issue unless you are suffering from dichromatism.

oh shit it actually goes to the beginning of a line, instant upgrade to god tier

On SSH that button is a killer, even works in vim. For home I never found any use.

Fellow deutans, fuck you

No problem, I see that the systems have developed and thanks for the explanations. Mainly my issue is user incompetency, which is a problem that has to be fixed. Less of a technical limitation, but more "software political". You shouldn't need to know anything about security practices to be safe IMO. The exact issue is also with Linux desktop.

In terms of the chain sizes, I doubt the growth would be that small if it had actual use. When also talking about integrating cryptos into a proper currency, the loss of coins, deaths of users, corrupted disks need to be taken into account. There needs to be some inflation on a coin for it to work in an economy, but I'm not too familiar with economics. Scalability is always an issue that pops up too, but I don't know much about it.

I get you responded to these already. Just more of a summary!

I think I just fundamentally disagree with the system then. I don't think that the user should be completely responsible for being hacked. The 2FA wallets like metamask still seem to be "hosted" on the computer, so after the user types in the 2FA the private key is exposed. Basically too much complication.

Also the cost for using that tech is also a problem, otherwise the blockchain? size will become too large. But beyond that my knowledge is limited. I guess we just disagree on the fundamentals.

That is the problem. 1 Fuck up and your money is gone. Whether that is someone else, you, CVE, it's gone and everyone elses in that network.

By death I was wrong; Difficulty wont kill a coin. Though that then has other issues.

I doubt you understand how bad deflation is for a currency, or you are in this for the money?

From scams to just cyber attacks with no safe guards would make everything impossible to handle. There is no bank covering you or insurance. People dying, losing keys etc drive deflation. BTC/Mining coins are destined to die. Maybe there is something there, but it certainly isn't finance.

Inflation is necessary for multiple reasons, but you can read on that yourself. Such as; what would happen if everyone considered holding to money an investment? IMO these facts make Fiat sound so much better...

Last time I checked all of those had real world value before the scams started.

For cryptos, it seems to be the other way around. They are trying to solve issues at the cost of having issues that are unacceptable and unfixable.