kjake

joined 1 year ago
[–] kjake@infosec.pub 13 points 1 month ago

I don’t use Immich, but want to say that your post here is very detailed and level-headed - and I appreciate it. Giving users more choice over how their data is used is always good.

[–] kjake@infosec.pub 3 points 4 months ago

Another +1 to openvas. Specifically, I have had much luck with this Dockerized version: https://github.com/immauss/openvas

[–] kjake@infosec.pub 13 points 5 months ago

This issue is extremely similar to problems found with both Intel and AMD processors too (see: Meltdown, Spectre).

[–] kjake@infosec.pub 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Reminds me of the artwork for the Memories anime anthology.

[–] kjake@infosec.pub 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah, it’s still confusing. It could be that since the ruling was made less than a month ago, there are active ad campaigns that they’re just going to let run their course, rather than cancel them.

But also, note the following from the source article:

Comcast said it may still use 10G in ways that are less likely to confuse consumers. "Consistent with the panel's recommendation... Comcast reserves the right to use the term '10G' or 'Xfinity 10G' in a manner that does not misleadingly describe the Xfinity network itself," the company said.

When contacted by Ars, a Comcast spokesperson said, "We disagree with the decision but are pleased that we have confirmed our continued use of 10G in advertising."

So maybe Ars overstepped in their headline?

[–] kjake@infosec.pub 63 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

Ars reported on this at the end of January.

Comcast reluctantly agrees to stop its misleading “10G Network” claims. Comcast said it will drop "Xfinity 10G Network" brand name after losing appeal.

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/01/comcast-to-stop-calling-entire-network-10g-as-name-is-ruled-misleading/

[–] kjake@infosec.pub 57 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Seems like it would be fairly simple to at least sue them in small claims court. California allows up to $6250 for businesses.

[–] kjake@infosec.pub 4 points 6 months ago

Good thing they monetized their API.

[–] kjake@infosec.pub 13 points 7 months ago

The ones that went through FIPS 140-2 Type 3 or above validation are legit. We used Apricorn for CUI data…examples: https://www.archives.gov/cui/registry/category-list

[–] kjake@infosec.pub 3 points 7 months ago

You can save files via streamlink: https://streamlink.github.io/

view more: next ›