when you play a game that multiple people have, you can choose which copy is being used. The owner of that copy and the one playing get banned
kiagam
elon musk was asked to point a legal rep and show up to answer questions about spreading fake news and promoting criminal activity. He denied point out the rep or participating in the investigation at all. There is some backlash as the judge gave the final warning on twitter since there was no legal rep, which would be a first.
so in a possible hostage situation as far as IDF claims (the hijacking), you bomb the bad guy with hostages? got it
check out this response
tldw: this is not a law or even a draft, it is a suggestion to lawmakwrs to start discussing the subject. the wording on it will not be carried over if it passes.
you don't see the ad and think "wow, that athlete is holding this one brand of cheese, I'm gonna buy it"
you mentally associate those two, and when you go to the supermarket, you see the brand and buy it out of instinct, since that brand gives you a good feeling subconsciously.
or if you ask yourself "I never bought parmesam cheese before, which brand is good? oh I've seen this one before, it must be good"
I'm not finding it now but there are some shorts where the guy gives a tong to teenagers and they don't double clack.
also no double press on a drill.
this generation is lost man
fifa is weird, it is a private company kinda but not really. And they have all rights to the word football (?)
the advantage of having a supranational organization is that everybody is looking at it and its reputation relies on how good it is. the disadvantage is that they have no power other than advisory
when you have to click once, means they have been gathering all your actions up to that point, and for sure you are human. If you get asked to click images, means they don't have enough information yet, or you failed some security step (wrong password) and the site told captcha to be extra sure
so they are destroying both the future and the families, got it
south africa and ireland are taking them to international court, but at the end of the day, it is the countries that actually have people/resources/power to enforce the court's orders. And nobody is willing to invade Israel to bring them to justice (and bring their leadership to the courthouse). Almost all countries in the UN signed treaties promising they would enforce arrest orders, but when push comes to shove, nobody wants to be the one to do it. Israeli offivials can go visit their allies freely
stop sharing your library with strangers and kick your brother's ass when he gets you banned