imaqtpie

I wish they'd have done a full NYC analysis. Just doing Manhattan has an obvious outcome, but including Brooklyn, Queens, and the Bronx would yield a more interesting result.

I see. Thanks for the explanation

Yeah the privacy aspect of Monero is definitely superior.

I think the fungibility of Nano is actually great, I believe the coins can be divided to 12 decimal places or something. Unless I'm misunderstanding what fungibility means.

The Nano use case is similar to cash, it's easy and fast, but I agree that it's not really useful for major financial transactions. More like buying a cup of coffee for someone across the world with no fees and instant transaction time.

Bitcoin always promised something like that, but in reality there are massive fees and transactions take forever to complete, so it's just not fit for purpose.

I'm partial to Nano as the most practical currency implementation. Feeless, instant, decentralized. But only in theory, I'm not actually invested or anything. Monero seems relatively cool too.