iamak

joined 1 year ago
[–] iamak@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago

At this point I just assume Meta, Google and Apple have my number due to people storing the number on their devices. Amazon also might have it because people might have paid me via Amazon Pay (and given it access to contacts).

[–] iamak@infosec.pub 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes. I don't endorse WhatsApp. What I meant is if you chat with 15 people out of which 5 use WhatsApp, only those 5 chats are potentially readable by Meta. Because those are the only chats which will get sent to Meta servers.

So you have the benefit that the other 10 chats are not readable by Meta.

[–] iamak@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago

Lmao my bad. Thanks I'll read up about it.

[–] iamak@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Google has also kept RCS proprietary. Google shares the blame as well imo

[–] iamak@infosec.pub 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

True. However there are certain advantages

  • WhatsApp gets only a part of your data (coz many people might be on different apps)
  • You don't have to run WhatsApp on your device so they can't collect that data either

I know it's not perfect but better than the current scenario and a step in the right direction

[–] iamak@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Oh wow. TIL! Any recommendws sources? I want to read the full coverage

[–] iamak@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago

I only heard of it because I follow Matrix blog.

I saw the technical discussions (if you are a tech person I would recommend watching those on YT) and it seems that EU is trying to find some middle ground where companies won't have to incur a lot of losses but still be open and create a fair environment for newcomers.

[–] iamak@infosec.pub 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (21 children)

I hope that the DMA gets passed in the EU. It'll (hopefully) break the monopoly worldwide

[–] iamak@infosec.pub 19 points 1 year ago

Why was it allowed in the first place? Generally I'm pro freedom but in this case the phones should be locked down and there should be a whitelist of apps they can install. It's not a personal phone.

[–] iamak@infosec.pub 5 points 1 year ago

I think a large part of why Framework laptops worked and no mobile equivalent has come up is because most of phone ecosystem is not free. When I install Lineage OS on my phone I always expect a decrease in the quality of photos because lot of the camera stuff is proprietary and baked into the OEM ROM.

I get that the Framework equivalent of phones can manufacture their own devices and write FOSS firmware for it but it's a big hurdle which not many can afford.

On the contrary in laptops/PCs you can install Linux and expect most of the hardware to work out of the box. So until phone ecosystem gets as free as PC ecosystem (I doubt it will considering how the corporations work) I doubt a Framework equivalent will be available for phones.

[–] iamak@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago

Quillpad is nice. I've been using it for about a year now. It satisfies all the 4 requirements as well.

[–] iamak@infosec.pub 13 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Why do people have to pronounced it in any way? Why not say G-I-F? I've been saying it like that since before I knew about the huge debate💀

view more: ‹ prev next ›