heeplr

joined 1 year ago
[–] heeplr@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

pdfsandwich macht das recht zuverlässig und benutzt intern auch tesseract. Vermutlich mit besseren Parametern.

[–] heeplr@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

nah. in my experience, even cheaper LED bulbs from discounters can nicely replace old bulbs.

It's true that what "el-cheapo product" once was done by simply reducing lifetime is currently done with looks.

[–] heeplr@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago

Umweltkatastrophe durch Elektroautofähre!

[–] heeplr@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

You could also get ultra cheap crappy incendescant bulbs in the past.

[–] heeplr@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

yeah, i was referring to current tech. First LED or those mercury vapor bulbs were basically useless.

[–] heeplr@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So you are saying

"The belief that climate change is unstoppable"

is the same thing as

"a temperature rise of 1.5 degrees Celsius is an existential threat to humanity"

Those are fundamentially different things and you just pulled some study you think is fitting to OPs article. But allright... I'm the one who's illiterate.

[–] heeplr@feddit.de 15 points 1 year ago (10 children)

tHe lIgHt is sO mUcH bEtTeR!!!)

narrator voice: "but it was not"

[–] heeplr@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Guy said “don’t be hyperbolic about the 1.5c goal because if people feel hopeless they are less likely to act.”

Then he's wrong. But it's more likely you misread the study since that's not the conclusion.

[–] heeplr@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

100.0 TiB(anana)

[–] heeplr@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wait, HOA statutes beat state law in the US? wow..

[–] heeplr@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

there will be a 'bastards up against the wall' moment for the ones responsible.

i can't see how that could prevent that. Quite the opposite, if half-assed efforts (without "state of emergency") lead to higher impact, people will get angrier than with lower impact, simply because more will have to struggle harder.

[–] heeplr@feddit.de -1 points 1 year ago

But first the environmental conditions must allow such activities to have the impacts they have.

Exactly. There might even be the same amount of arsonists/stupid people as in the 80s but it just burns better now. Incidents were no fire developed in the 80s can now spread to huge wildfires with a much higher chance.

Still the claim is true and probably has consequences for hikers, people who live in the woods, settlements near to forrests etc.

view more: ‹ prev next ›