griefstricken

joined 2 months ago
[–] griefstricken@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago (24 children)

What arguments did you make? You clearly have no problem repeating yourself. Seems like you don't even know what an argument is.

[–] griefstricken@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago (27 children)

You haven't made a single argument, you are completely delusional. You are welcome to attempt it now. If you're capable of getting your intransigent jingoistic attitude out of your mind for the thirty seconds it takes to scan my jibber jabber.

There is nothing to be angry about, Bloomberg, Financial Times, Foreign Policy, Foreign Affairs, WSJ, all of these outlets are fuming openly about the state of the war in Ukraine especially since a new front has been opened, for exactly the reasons that many observers like me have pointed out since late 2023. It isn't rocket science to keep track of cruise missile production and realize that the Russians are not running out washing machines! The Americans are running out of electrical transformers trying to replace the damage caused, and overall their air defense supplies are deeply, deeply in the red.

The fact that you keep insisting that I am copying and pasting responses is honestly refreshing compared to saying I am a Russian bot or AI. Quite a few times I responded to you I believe it was a multiple hour interim because I have you know other things to do! I guess I am getting you pretty breathless with my shitposting directly into your ass aren't you? This is just how I talk. I don't even have a keyboard on me!

You are clearly having an emotional and ideological reaction to the simple points that Russia has benefitted in many ways from the sanctions more than Europe and America have lost from it (look at the energy market), and that pushing RISCV to Switzerland and the tech to China with the chip sanctions (without which there would have been no good reason for Chinese industries to devote so much R&D to their homegrown technologies) will push people away from US industries in the long term, as will the Linux Foundation banning Russians who actually have a job from being maintainers.

[–] griefstricken@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago (29 children)

Here is the difference between me and a baboon, I can argue, baboons cannot. Both baboons and I know how to mock and jeer. Get the picture?

[–] griefstricken@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago

You did not even attempt to refute anything I said, the entire conversation has been you callng me a Russian and saying you don't want to have a discussion and saying "I know what you are but what am I". I am confident you will continue this indefinitely to reassure yourself.

You do not know how to argue at all, this is not arguing, this is jeering! You have to pick a lane, old sport. 🐱

[–] griefstricken@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago

He claims to be an ancom but also a warlock, so, not a materialist for sure

[–] griefstricken@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I think Alan is an ancom unfortunately on a bit of a Debord "oh no not the spectacle" bent here. Cultural analysis of fascist ideologies falls flat compared to historical analysis of fascism.

Example I always give is Verhoeven putting a "sexless" scene in Starship Troopers essentially as a reference to Orwell's "people only have sex for the party in the evil socialist future, also young women are prudes and snitches grrrr" (let's skirt past the real reasons he wrote that) - it doesn't make any actual sense for the people watching it, like "oh this is weird why aren't they slavering over each other like dogs????” did not occur to people. The subtext is too literary and also not really subversive at all.

Trying to examine fascism as a collection of particular beliefs just doesn't hold up.

Is it disturbing people are lining up for Marvel movies? I guess, but he is treating this like a supply and demand thing. Do people really clamor for movies like Battlefield and Iron Man to have imperialist ideology in them, or do they just kind of go see what's on tap? It again reverses the cause and effect of fascist ideology. Ideology is a tool for them, a guise that can be discarded, or used to parody and mock other movements.

[–] griefstricken@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago (32 children)

You did not even attempt to prove me wrong. You visualize a possibility where you could. But you are mistaken, pro-Ukrainian sources are admitting what I am saying to you.

You are just egoistic and stupid.

[–] griefstricken@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 weeks ago (34 children)

You're really just going to copy and paste one of your prior comments, but I am the one copy and pasting? Are you completely out of ways to reassure yourself that not engaging with any of my arguments about the blowback of politicizing Linux on NATO's premises is the smart guy thing to do?

Seems more like the propaganda loving soup brained response to me, stupidly repeating yourself again. I'm just hitting you with face shots over and over again and you don't even block.

[–] griefstricken@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Nobody would ever do this on Lemmy though

video essay

Yeah no I am good. I think you should assume people are using alts until proven otherwise. Like the people on here accusing everyone of being Russian bots.

[–] griefstricken@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 weeks ago (36 children)

Oh, you're not mad, you're laughing? That's a good cliche stock phrase too.

I see you're so involved in repeating your Reddit cliches to me that you forgot the entire conversation prior to this. I actually have no responsibility to link you to the prior replies in our comment chain.

What are your ideas?

You already forgot what the conversation is about and are just smashing that rage quit "SHUT UP RUSSIAN!!!!” button. You are playing dumb about why you responded in Russian in the first place, because you know it was incredibly stupid and jingoistic of you. I am glad you're unable to stand by your actions and now have to veer back from NYAH NYAH RUSSIAN NYAH NYAH to "erm, I am so affronted, how dare you call me an idiot, I actually wanted to insult you for no reason and I didn't read what you were saying".

I think everything about what you are doing is pathetic and cowardly. Just like everyone else on this subject of sabotaging the Linux Foundation, all you have are your lies, and you certainly know how to peevishly stand by them. You are a good dog begging for scraps from foreign wars. You won't get any.

[–] griefstricken@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago (38 children)

Literally everything I put in the text box is clearly stream of consciousness original writing. That'a why it bothers you so much. I communicate in a way you can't about your ideas because I am telling the truth about my observations and principles.

That's funny, you're using stock "lol u mad" "quiet russian bot" phrases, and now you declare you don't have any reason to argue with my ideas because I copy pasted them. You copy and pasted everything you know into your mind from Reddit and other shithole websites.

[–] griefstricken@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 weeks ago (40 children)

You're completely out of your depth. You can't even respond. Just more thought cancelling cliches.

view more: ‹ prev next ›