exocrinous

joined 8 months ago
[–] exocrinous@startrek.website 2 points 6 months ago

And they ALL suck!

Polearms win 90% of the time

[–] exocrinous@startrek.website 3 points 6 months ago

Miss you with the greatest passion

[–] exocrinous@startrek.website 11 points 6 months ago

No, it's observation. An experiment involves manipulating an independent variable while controlling other variables. There's none of that in space, not counting the ISS and Apollo. That said, you can still test hypotheses using observation. And that's equally true in both astronomy and in social sciences.

[–] exocrinous@startrek.website 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That's irrelevant. Astronomy and polsci can both only test their hypotheses through observation.

[–] exocrinous@startrek.website 1 points 6 months ago (3 children)

What are soft sciences supposed to do when experimental methods are either impractical or unethical?

Same thing astronomy did.

[–] exocrinous@startrek.website 9 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Hey genius, if you need experimentation in order for a field to be a real science, then explain how astronomy is a science.

[–] exocrinous@startrek.website 1 points 6 months ago

It's mainly called social science in my country.

[–] exocrinous@startrek.website -2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Same with Astronomy.

[–] exocrinous@startrek.website 8 points 6 months ago

Y'all straight people who only just heard of this discourse should spend more time listening to asexuals

[–] exocrinous@startrek.website 1 points 6 months ago

They’re just being puritanical or shy with their movie watching company.

Or asexual and sex repulsed, or sexually traumatized. Why do you jump straight to calling people reactionaries when there are perfectly good legitimate reasons for their behaviour? It's almost like you don't believe in asexuals.

[–] exocrinous@startrek.website 4 points 6 months ago

Can't you red card the bullies?

[–] exocrinous@startrek.website 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Well the last one was One so this one must be Two

view more: ‹ prev next ›