You are describing what should be done with a powerful economy. Not how to create a powerful economy. Abolishing the stock market will not encourage wealth distribution. It will make the economy weaker, and could easily make wealth concentration worse.
The right move is to reform the stock market, imposing rules on company ownership. That's why I brought up Germany. All companies in Germany above a certain size must be 40% owned by their employees.
This is just the latest indication that our parliament will never enact electoral reform. Where do we go from here?
Canada has not been in control of its government for a long time now. This vote in parliament is just the latest indication that this will never change. I officially give up, and am moving to Europe. I have already applied to the university.
To the Liberals, the Tories, and all of their supporters: you made me leave. Please stay the fuck in Canada.
To the rest of Canada: join me.
What do you mean by "improve the economy"?
"Stupid" is a characteristic of stupid people. Do you disagree with its usage as well?
original: https://yewtu.be/watch?v=ipAnwilMncI
I like it better when I can hear Navalnyi, and the English captions are quite serviceable.
I didn't use it as the main post because I thought there might be language rules.
You're saying it usually does not function properly as a means of buying and selling control over companies? Because Musk bought his first big piece of Twitter on the stock market. That's an example of the stock market working as intended. I would argue that this is how the stock market usually works. This is not gambling. This is the purchase of a tangible asset.
ad hominem