effingjoe

joined 1 year ago
[–] effingjoe@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Oh. Yeah that's nonsense.

[–] effingjoe@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Please for the sake of my sanity go read the link you provided. It will clear up your befuddlement.

[–] effingjoe@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I am not making a claim. How are you so confused?

[–] effingjoe@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I did read it that's why I know you haven't.

[–] effingjoe@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I honestly have no idea what you're talking about. What is a fedipact? What does me signing it (or not signing it) mean? Does it say something about NDAs? I've under one right now for work.

What "level playing field" are you referencing? With respect to what?

[–] effingjoe@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Someone has to be, since we have conflicting claims.

[–] effingjoe@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

No it is not. Just read the damn link you provided. FFS

[–] effingjoe@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (7 children)

My dude, what are you doing here?

There is no evidence to support your stance that this dude was sidelined because of his views. All you have is his claim that they sidelined him for his views.

This appears to be another conspiracy theory.

Focus, man.

[–] effingjoe@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I keep getting the feeling you've never actually been under an NDA.

What are you imagining the worst-case scenario is for what could be discussed? You clearly have globbed on to this idea and NDAs mean something nefarious is going on, and since you apparently can't be reasoned out of that particular conspiracy theory, help me understand what your concern is.

[–] effingjoe@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (14 children)

A claim is not evidence.

[–] effingjoe@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Have some self respect.

There has been little to no research allowed that might prove otherwise, but some countries (that were denied access to the vaccine for profit reasons) seemed to have great success using it.

The "it" they were using is clearly horse dewormer. Not sidelined CDC directors.

Also, just putting this out there. You can see who upvotes and downvotes any given comment.

[–] effingjoe@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (16 children)

Not according to your link, no.

view more: ‹ prev next ›