derpo

joined 1 year ago
[–] derpo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Damn, and it’s even AI generated. I really like this one. Wish I knew the prompt

[–] derpo@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You’re an all-star

[–] derpo@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] derpo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago
[–] derpo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Frick he’s right

[–] derpo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

That’s right! Corridor Digital is all up on the CGI UFO’s lately. They just made a hoax Tesla 3 cam vid

[–] derpo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I’ve been kind of noticing the same with my pax lately and I’m glad you put into words what I’ve been intuiting

[–] derpo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You live in a utopia

[–] derpo@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Much appreciated! Very interesting story

[–] derpo@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I was really curious about the thought process here, but now I understand slightly more lol

A covering of tires could well be calculated to break up the infrared signature of these aircraft, to confuse cruise missiles using image matching for targeting. This technique is also frequently referred to as DSMAC (Digital Scene Matching Area Correlator) or ATR (Automated Target Recognition) when used in cruise missiles. As we have previously discussed, using DSMAC/ATR would provide land attack versions of Ukraine’s homegrown Neptune missiles with a significant advantage, making them largely immune to electronic warfare jamming. At the same time, their approach to the target would not involve any telltale radio-frequency emissions, thanks to the passive nature of the targeting.

view more: next ›