crashfrog
Once a week is fine. You're clean when you get out of the shower, and the towel air-dries as you're not using it. Even where I live - 65% humidity year-round - we only wash the towels once a week.
Consider this: the strong association of turkey with Thanksgiving means that you're not expected to eat it any any other time.
I think if you want to understand racism, you can't understand it as the failure to have certain pieces of knowledge. Racists generally aren't unaware that people experience suffering when they're held down or held back from their appropriate station in life.
What racists generally believe, if you're trying to be maximally charitable to the views of racists (ugh), is that human suffering also comes from pushing people into societal roles that are above their station. The individual so pushed suffers, and society suffers for having "the wrong people" in important roles. For instance, that's the view that held that slavery for Black Americans was good for them.
I think a racist in that strain would play the Detroit game and not be convinced, since the game likely doesn't address that position at all.
You've made up your mind that it was a mistaken intruder.
Yes, on the basis of what I know about the crime it's extremely obvious that he shot what he mistook as an intruder, and extremely obvious that he did not engage in a plot to murder his girlfriend for no known reason.
But note that I don't actually have to believe this to conclude that his conviction was unjust. Conviction must result from belief in his guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and since his explanation is exculpatory of murder, if you can't rebut it beyond reasonable doubt, you cannot convict. Defendants in trials are the ones afforded benefit of the doubt, not prosecutors.
And considering only he can know that for sure, I think that's the only reasonable conclusion you can draw.
Right, but then you agree with my position; it was unjust for him to have been convicted of murder because we can't possibly know that he committed murder.
I certainly have no interest in debating all of these hypothetical motives he could have had.
I have no intention of requiring you to. But motive is a necessity for the crime of murder, because murder is the intentional killing of a person, and motive goes to intent.
Lotta malls and pizza in "concentration camps"?