Ender 3 V2 Neo. Low cost, good quality, easy to put together, and includes most of the "upgrades" you would usually end up buying separately anyway (auto-leveling, etc.). Good entry-level printer that performs very well and will handle most anything you throw at it (large bulky parts, or small detailed miniatures). May be all you need for a good long while. I've had mine printing 2-3 things a week for a year and a half without any issue.
calculuschild
joined 1 year ago
I'd still call it a legacy game. While legacy games usually involve physically, permanently, altering the pieces, it's not required; just that previous sessions carry some impact over to the next. At least that's what I've seen.
I would say simply adding and removing cards from the game counts as a legacy mechanic, since at any time my copy of Oath is going to play different than your copy based on our play history.
Maybe "legacy-lite"?
Edit: seems the term might be "Fable"? https://boardgamegeek.com/boardgamefamily/44081/series-fable-game-system
Bro gaming is social life.
Ah. I have the APK from a Humble Bundle a few years ago. Still works fine on my Galaxy S22 which is using the latest Android version. Looks like it's just the Google Play store being a bit picky. But if you can find the APK it's an awesome game.
Ah. I have the APK from a Humble Bundle a few years ago. Still works fine on my Galaxy S22 which is using the latest Android version. Looks like it's just the Google Play store being a bit picky. But if you can find the APK it's an awesome game.
Wayward Souls. Nice top-down roguelike with excellent controls and a bit of story you reveal as you explore the dungeons.
Nice job! What are you going to use them for?
Wayward Souls. Nice top-down roguelike with excellent controls and a bit of story you reveal as you explore the dungeons.
GitHub issue has been reported here for those interested: https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy-ui/issues/1895
My understanding is this claim is basically entirely false. The tests done by these researchers had some glaring errors that when corrected, show gpt-4 is getting slightly better at math, if anything. See this video that describes some of the issues: https://youtu.be/YSokS2ivf7U
TL;DR The researchers gave new GPT questions from two different pools. It's no surprise they got worse answers.