brian

joined 7 months ago
[–] brian@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 months ago

In my opinion, open world doesn't mean being able to complete any objective in an arbitrary order.

Progressive growth is one of the most rewarding things in an RPG for me. That means that I have to rethink my path forward until I gain the strength to overcome an obstacle. And that also means that some of my once difficult foes can be a showcase for my experience.

Areas aren't blocked, they're turned into goals for me to overcome. Yes, I should have a choice in how I explore the world, but having limits gives you something to break through.

[–] brian@lemmy.ca 11 points 6 months ago (2 children)

This is my running complaint with most Bethesda RPGs. Just about everything scales by player level, which can put you in situations where enemies are downright impossible to kill if you're too spec'd into non-combats.

[–] brian@lemmy.ca 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

So I missed it the first time. But the title is "A The Lord of the Rings Game". Assumedly to maintain copyright, they did not drop the "The" from "The Lord of the Rings" even though they started with "A"

[–] brian@lemmy.ca 93 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Interesting how insurance companies demand restrictions to "special enrollment" periods or specified times to begin coverage. It's a tactic to prevent people from beginning coverage before taking on significant healthcare costs and then cancelling after their treatment is finished.

But yet, an insurance company is able to change coverage without following similar practices? Is just about as close to a bait and switch as you can get.

[–] brian@lemmy.ca 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

My criteria would entirely allow for early "soft" transitions as you call them. Hormone therapy is significantly less invasive than any type of surgery you could undergo, as well as being similarly "reversible" like a vasectomy. I would have a similar stance to a child making a monumental choice to fully transition. Beginning on the path of a transition is much different than leaping to the final step.

My concerns typically would lie in the sense of manufactured risk when lower risk options are readily available and effective. Condoms are inexpensive, especially when you're comparing to a surgical procedure. Condoms have a reasonably good efficacy when properly used, and is increased significantly when used alongside other contraceptives (not to mention the additional benefits of lowering risk of STIs/STDs).

And just as an added question for you, if these surgeries were not reversible at all, would your views on this change?

We can leave the question of legality vs morality of the subject to the side.

[–] brian@lemmy.ca 8 points 6 months ago (5 children)

I think you may have misunderstood some of what they were getting at.

To make a bad equivalency: would you have any reservations with someone younger than 18 choosing to have a vasectomy/tubes tied? What about 16? 13?

At some point we are going to agree that making that permanent¹ life choice isn't a good idea as they just simply aren't mature enough.

What the person you're responding to is trying to get at, I think, is that many of these preferences or desires can easily change in your formative years as a young adult (18-25 for full frontal lobe development, I believe).

¹I am aware that vasectomies and tubal ligations can be reversed, but that's not something you would want to be relying on with these choices. Similar to how you don't plan to be able to have a tattoo removed a few years down the line when you decide you don't like it.

[–] brian@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'll bite.

I would choose Biden winning.

[–] brian@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 months ago (8 children)

But... Biden is shipping weapons to Israel?

[–] brian@lemmy.ca 27 points 6 months ago (5 children)

My only issue with Firefox is some extensions get a little fussy in-between updates, but it seems to be a Linux issue more than a Firefox one.

And my problem is most definitely a skill issue.

[–] brian@lemmy.ca 42 points 6 months ago (4 children)

I think we're going to need a bit of an explanation here

[–] brian@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 months ago

What's amusing to me is that they referred to the job interviewer having similar reliability, but didn't say whether it was good or not. Purely let the bias of the article imply that they were highly reliable.

[–] brian@lemmy.ca 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Agreed. For the other side of the Atlantic, it is ground or 1st floor, 2nd floor.

view more: ‹ prev next ›