bauhaus

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] bauhaus@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That’s the problem with charity— free reporting becomes a privilege bestowed to a select a few by private institutions and subject to their whims rather than a right guaranteed to everyone by the government. 

[–] bauhaus@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

many companies have multi-year commercial leases they suddenly can’t get out of and lots of office furniture they can’t liquidate. it’s a huge investment that suddenly worthless. (boo-hoo!)

[–] bauhaus@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (21 children)

if that funding were guaranteed and beyond the influence of those government officials, then they wouldn’t have any fear of revenge-based budget cuts.

this could be accomplished by putting control of the funding into the hands of multiple levels of committee oversight so that no one person or even a single committee could threaten it.

[–] bauhaus@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

who said I hated it? also, it’s not really written by a chatbot. it was later revealed that the comedian had written all of this (and another, similar “chatbot script”) themselves and simply passed it off as such.

[–] bauhaus@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

"The Truth is Out There"

[–] bauhaus@lemmy.ml 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (10 children)

that’s why I overwrote all ofmy comments with gibberish 10 times before I deleted them, so even if they un-deleted them and/or restored previous version, they’d have real trouble finding a version that wasn’t total gibberish. I just knew they’d pull this crap.

[–] bauhaus@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I agree that, if these allegations turn out to be true, it’s pretty damned scummy. but is it copyright infringement to tell a story from a certain perspective?

I mean, I’ve seen the film, and I’ve skimmed through the book. they both focus on the most interesting parts of the story as any dramatic retelling would, and the story itself lends itself to a certain interpretation, regardless of who writes about it. Personally, I don’t see the story bing told (at least from the protagonist’s perspective) any other way and there are certainly many differences between them that are immediately evident. But it would seem to me that anyone telling a story about those events would end up with a similar story simply because they’re based on real people and historical events.

but you’re right that there’s probably enough “there there” to warrant adjudication and would depend on the interpretations of copyright law by the judge and jury, if it were to go to trial.

edit: btw, your use of a musical isn’t a great analogy since musicals have way more original material (the music) tat can be used to prove or dispute a copyright infringement claim than simply interpretation of an historical event.

[–] bauhaus@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

it’s history. it happened. Ackerman didn’t invent the story, unless he’s claiming that’s the case…?

If I write a book about The Prohibition, is Ken Burns going to sue me because he once made a docu-series about it?

[–] bauhaus@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

“I’d play more games, but I’m too busy working to afford the upgrades to my PC, upgrading my PC, and then going online to discuss how much I’ve upgraded my PC! Also, hopping linux distros every time I hear about a new one, and then going online to talk about that!"

[–] bauhaus@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I wouldn’t return to work if you offered me the whole building.

for my entire career, 100% of my work has been on the computer. once in a while, I may have some client interaction, and for that videoconferencing is fin 99.99% of the time. the 0.01% it’s not, I can go on-site. I’ve never attended a meeting that couldn’t have been an email or that couldn’t be handled via videoconference. what managers I’ve had fall into 2 categories:

  • The Quite Ones: these are the good managers who send short emails regarding project needs/goals and periodically check in on progress, providing feedback when necessary.
  • The Overbearing Micromanagers: jerkwads who feel the need to constantly insinuate themselves into my process and assert their position of power just for the sake of it, often negatively affecting both my workflow and the end-results of the project itself. They send huge, monotonous emails full of corporate-speak which say very little, set regular meetings that waste time and accomplish nothing, and set capricious, pointless policies which often change equally capriciously. I suspect this is done because they’re too incompetent to do their actual jobs and are designed both distract from that and remind us “who’s boss.”

Obviously, the first can be dealt with 100% remotely, and the second has positioned themselves, through being terrible at their jobs and being terrible people in general, to require workers to be present, mostly to justify their own jobs which would amount to nothing if there were no employees physically present to subject to their petty torments.

so, yeah, give me my own office? that’s not gonna cut it, as it changes exactly 0 of the reasons why I never want to return to the office, which are the commute, the stifling work atmosphere, the management, and the fact that there’s 0 reason to ever be there physically anyway due to the nature of my work.

[–] bauhaus@lemmy.ml 47 points 1 year ago (16 children)

reminds me of that Ken Patti twitter post:

I forced a bot to watch over 1,000 hours of Trump rallies and then asked it to write a Trump rally of its own. Here is the first page.

[–] bauhaus@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It’s a good episode and I would have liked to have seen further exploration of the ancient civilization. There’s this faulty idea in the first few seasons of TNG Trek that older tech is worse.

While I definitely agree on wishing for further exploration of this ancient culture, I don’t really agree that Trek, esp TNG, treated ancient tech as “worse”. Many times in Trek, we see leftover tech from ancient civilizations, and it’s almost always highly-advanced. even in the first season of TNG, the crew encounters remnants of the Tkon Federation, a civilization from 600,000 years ago whose powerful technology has trapped the Enterprise and a Ferengi ship in the orbit of a planetary outpost in TNG S01E05 - ”The Last Outpost”.

In the second season, we’re introduced to the Iconians, an ancient civilization that collapsed 200,000 years earlier, when the Enterprise discovers their homeworld, Iconia, in TNG S02E11 - ”Contagion". In addition to sending probes which infect the main computer of the Enterprise (and its sister ship the Yamato) with computer code so advanced, it completely rewrites it to calamitous effect. Iconians most notably created gateway technology, which they used to construct gateways which allowed them to move from one location to another - presumably over unlimited distances - instantly, simply by walking through one of these gateways. Although we got to see Iconian gateway again in DS9 S04E23 - ”To The Death”, I really wish we could have learned more about what sounded like a very interesting ancient civilization.

And, yeah, the whole thing about Geordi being an incel was creepy and sad.

view more: ‹ prev next ›