alvvayson

joined 1 year ago
[–] alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 months ago

He said those things towards the end of his life after he had been smeared for years.

Prior to that interview in 1983, he had criticized Israel for the atrocities they committed in Lebanon and people called him an anti-semite for comparing Israel to Nazi-Germany.

Eventually, he said fuck it, and went full anti-semite.

I don't blame the guy. He's only human and people can only take so much shit before they turn into bitter old men.

[–] alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 months ago (6 children)

I used to think Jeremy Corbyn was an anti-semite. I also used to think Roald Dahl was an anti-semite.

But after researching what they actually said, it's clear that they were just smeared, because they weren't racist enough against Palestinians and (shockingly) thought Palestinians deserve human rights.

Honestly, I am now highly skeptical whenever someone calls another person an anti-semite.

[–] alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 months ago

The fediverse would be an improvement for now. But if it gets popular, bots will take over.

And corporate owned media hasn't really brought us much good, either.

It got us into wars in Vietnam and Iraq and it also got us the destruction of the middle class.

I don't think there really is a silver bullet. Best I can think of is, media owned by the people and for the people.

[–] alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 85 points 2 months ago (5 children)

The eggs we buy in supermarkets come from hens who have never seen a cock.

It's basically bird menstruation in a shell.

[–] alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 2 months ago

The US never did anything about Rachel Corrie or the USS Liberty or Hersh Goldberg-Polin. And we can probably add hundreds of Palestinian Americans to the list, but even their names aren't known in the mainstream media.

It seems the USA capacity to care depends on how much AIPAC will allow it to care.

[–] alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They aren't combatants or PoW, taking them hostage was a human rights violation from the beginning.

But Israel can't really expect Hamas to follow Geneva conventions when they themselves violate it a hundreds times as often.

[–] alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 132 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Because they manage to attract investment.

As long as investors are willing to give cash in exchange for equity, a company can operate on that cash and run at a loss.

[–] alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Look, I wouldn't trust the GOP with my shit stained underwear.

Of course they don't have a better plan.

But voters who vote for them are still voters.

And falling for a false narrative doesn't make them hypocrites.

[–] alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And the apartheid, too.

[–] alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Hamas is trying to keep as many alive as they can.

But (a) 2000 pound bunker busters don't discriminate between Palestinians and Israelis and (b) if the IDF comes too close to the hostages, their guards have to decide whether to let them go alive or to kill them.

In the case of the Druze guy, I can definitely see Hamas choosing not to kill him. But in cases of Israelis who also served in the IDF, the rational choice is to kill them instead of giving the IDF a propaganda win.

And finally, sometimes the IDF probably accidentally kills them and tries to blame Hamas if they can get away with it.

[–] alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 68 points 2 months ago (11 children)

They could have had all the hostages back in October. Hamas just wanted back the hostages that Israel holds.

And again, they could have had all the hostages back in May.

Netanyahu seems committed to genocide and the hostages are collateral damage.

It's deranged and I am ashamed our western leaders are cheerleading this.

view more: ‹ prev next ›