Zombiepirate

joined 1 year ago
[–] Zombiepirate@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Our new government is founded upon exactly the opposite ideas; its foundations are laid, its cornerstone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery, subordination to the superior race, is his natural and normal condition. This, our new government, is the first, in the history of the world, based upon this great physical, philosophical, and moral truth. This truth has been slow in the process of its development, like all other truths in the various departments of science.

  • Alexander Stephens, vice president of the Confederate States of America

This is the "heritage" that they value.

[–] Zombiepirate@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

It's not displaying correctly on my app, that's likely why.

I like your style.

[–] Zombiepirate@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thanks for saying so! Birds are my favorite.

[–] Zombiepirate@lemm.ee 44 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

“For Republicans, the only hope is that when Trump is on the ballot in 2024 … he will turn out rural voters at a rate that overwhelms that phenomenon. It’s certainly possible,” the source said.

Isn't it funny that the only "hope" for Republicans is to re-install a vile, amoral, nepotistic, habitually-lying, tax-cheating, proudly-ignorant, racist, fascist, rapist con-man who tried to overthrow the government?

Wait, not "funny," the other one...

Stupid.

[–] Zombiepirate@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sure, but Jesus would have smacked the shit out of Paul, too. It's kind of been that way since the beginning of the religion.

[–] Zombiepirate@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm confused about what part is against her religion:

  • calling kids by their name?
  • not being a bigot?
  • not making everything about her?

Regardless, we know whose religious rights will be protected by the SCOTUS most high: the one who is imposing her ignorant worldview upon a captive audience. Funny how believing in magic gets you extra rights in this country.

[–] Zombiepirate@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh, I was referring to the media and security as the ones being paid.

I don't think he has the cash on hand to pay for attendance.

[–] Zombiepirate@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

I always love how the Catholic Church gets to have it both ways: they simultaneously are bound by centuries of traditions that they revere, but are also not to held accountable for the damage that they've done merely a decade ago.

Have they apologized for trying to force their morally backwards religion on people? Have they funded lobbies to expand LGBTQ rights to reverse some of the damage they've done historically?

Do you think that the Cardinals who run the diaces who donated thone millions of dollars have reformed their ideas regarding same-sex marriage?

All the Catholic Church has done is to dress up their bigotry as inclusion, and credulous news agencies do their PR for them about how much the Catholic Church has changed to be more inclusive.

So I ask you, if you think they've changed: what exactly have they changed? They still lobby the government to impose their religion on the rest of us, they still believe that "acting on" gay urges is evil and weak, and they are still hiding child predators. The Catholic Church is an enormous institution, and merely replacing the CEO doesn't mean that every franchise is magically aligned with his new vision.

So how is pointing out their actual values (a particularly ironic turn of phrase) "bad faith?"

They've shown their contempt for sexual minorities for centuries; I think we should believe them.

[–] Zombiepirate@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yes, in the quoted scene Juliet is asking why Romeo has to be a Montague with whom her family is feuding:

O Romeo, Romeo, wherefore art thou Romeo? Deny thy father and refuse thy name.

Or if thou wilt not, be but sworn my love And I’ll no longer be a Capulet.

‘Tis but thy name that is my enemy: Thou art thyself, though not a Montague.

What’s Montague? It is nor hand nor foot Nor arm nor face nor any other part Belonging to a man. O be some other name.

What’s in a name? That which we call a rose By any other name would smell as sweet;

So Romeo would, were he not Romeo call’d, Retain that dear perfection which he owes Without that title. Romeo, doff thy name, And for that name, which is no part of thee, Take all myself.

[–] Zombiepirate@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

where·fore /ˈ(h)werˌfôr/

ARCHAIC

adverb

for what reason. "she took an ill turn, but wherefore I cannot say"

view more: ‹ prev next ›