WldFyre

joined 1 year ago
[–] WldFyre@lemm.ee 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ohhh I thought he was giving weed to a minor, and I was super confused on what the message was supposed to be haha

[–] WldFyre@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Even the PS4 and Xbox One were able to produce gorgeous graphics.

But not always (or even usually IMO) at decent frame rates. I get major motion sickness and nauseous if a game doesn't run near 60fps constantly, it's really unfortunate.

[–] WldFyre@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago

I did! I loved them as a kid, that's why I tried out To Sleep In A Sea Of Stars because I like Paolini

[–] WldFyre@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I was going to suggest this book! It's my favorite scifi book of all time, I genuinely love it.

And if you go for the audiobook version, it's narrated by Jennifer Hale! Who of course fucking nails it!

[–] WldFyre@lemm.ee 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Shocking, no argument or refutation from a sexist chud.

[–] WldFyre@lemm.ee 7 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I've not seen any evidence it was a mistranslation, and they've made multiple similar comments. And there's a few in-game moments that also reflect that type of casual misogyny. I've also seen it commented on by several outlets and players in the genre, so I have no idea what you mean by "hit piece" since I'm not referring to a single article.

Second, why on earth wouldn't you open with this as your argument instead of "apparently the sexist comment by the devs was right"?? Lol it seems like you support the Gamergate level sexism smh

Critical support for sexist game devs is praxis, apparently /s

[–] WldFyre@lemm.ee 5 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Unsurprisingly and unfortunately, there are plenty of sexist, dumb chud Gamers™ who don't care about sexist developers.

[–] WldFyre@lemm.ee 11 points 3 days ago (7 children)

Aren't these the "we don't need female players" devs?

[–] WldFyre@lemm.ee 1 points 5 days ago

The "utility" of utilitarianism isn't that type of utility. IIRC it generally refers to the idea of maximizing happiness and minimizing harm, with a focus on outcomes of the whole, rather than the individual. Efficiency of labor doesn't explicitly factor into it.

Personally, I think you're just rationalizing being lazy and potentially causing harm to others, which isn't utilitarian at all.

[–] WldFyre@lemm.ee 7 points 6 days ago (2 children)

From a utilitarian perspective

Pretty sure that's not what utilitarianism means lol

[–] WldFyre@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago

It's a weak criticism without comparisons. As others in the comments pointed out, most countries around the world have similar numbers, and I don't think we're on the brink of a worldwide revolution lol

Plus it's not like France was some bastion of democracy after the French Revolution, we should really be trying to avoid past mistakes.

And since people who often post such hyper-fixated US-centric economic critiques usually argue in favor of China, I genuinely wanted to know how China's numbers look too. I'm certain Russia's numbers are fucking terrible but I wanted a laugh so I included them.

[–] WldFyre@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

What are China and Russia like, for comparison?

view more: next ›